40
$\begingroup$

That is, is there an open cover of $\mathbb{R}P^n$ by $n$ sets homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^n$?

I came up with this question a few years ago and I´ve thought about it from time to time, but I haven´t been able to solve it. I suspect the answer is negative but I´m not very sure. Also, is there an area of topology which studies questions like this one?

$\endgroup$
9
  • 11
    $\begingroup$ I'm baffled as to why this got downvoted. I imagine it is straightforward with some alg. top. tool I don't know, but it can't be that easy: $S^n$ is coverable with two copies of $\mathbb{R}^n$, so it isn't like compact $n$-folds always need $n+1$ charts. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 26, 2021 at 2:09
  • 11
    $\begingroup$ A relevant concept here that you can look up goes by “Lusternik-Schnirelmann category”. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 26, 2021 at 2:29
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ It's not true for $n=1$, at least... $\endgroup$
    – David Roberts
    Commented Nov 26, 2021 at 2:34
  • 14
    $\begingroup$ I think the answer is negative. If a manifold can be covered by $n$ contractible charts then its cup length will be less than $n$. The cup-length for the projective space $\mathbb{RP}^n$ is $n$. $\endgroup$
    – user127776
    Commented Nov 26, 2021 at 2:41
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ @DavidESpeyer: This is a standard homework problem, and it's clearly false for $n=1$. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 26, 2021 at 6:30

2 Answers 2

37
$\begingroup$

Expanding on the comment by @user127776, the key reference is Palais, "Lusternik-Schnirelman Theory on Banach Manifolds", Topology 5 (1966), where it is proved that if $X$ can be covered by $n$ contractible closed sets, then the cup-length of $X$ is strictly less than $n$.

(Here the cup-length is the largest $n$ such that for some field $F$ and some elements $c_1,\ldots,c_n$ in $H^*(X,F)$, we have $c_1\cup\ldots\cup c_n\neq 0$.)

This rules out covering ${\mathbb RP}^n$ with $n$ closed contractible sets, which should suffice here (after slightly shrinking the given $n$ copies of ${\mathbb R}^n$).

Editing to add:

More generally, suppose $X$ is a compact Hausdorff space covered by $n$ closed sets $X_1,\ldots, X_n$ with all $H^1(X_i,{\mathbb Z}/2{\mathbb Z})=0 $. (Equivalently, any (real) line bundle on $X_i$ is trivial.)

Theorem. Any line bundle on $X$ can be generated by $n$ sections.

Proof. Let $\hat{X}= Spec(C(X,{\mathbb R}))$, so that $X$ imbeds in $\hat{X}$. Note that:

  1. Because $X$ is normal, each $X_i$ is defined by the vanishing of a continuous function, so the $\hat{X}_i$ form a closed covering of $\hat{X}$.

  2. By Swan's theorem, the map that takes a vector bundle over $\hat{X}$ to its pullback over $X$ is an equivalence of categories (and likewise with $X$ replaced by $X_i$).

Now because every line bundle on $X_i$ is trivial, so is every line bundle on $\hat{X}_i$.

Because $\hat{X}$ is an affine scheme, a line bundle corresponds to a projective module, which in turn is the image of an idempotent matrix with entries in $C(X,{\mathbb R})$. A little thought reveals that this matrix can be taken to be $n\times n$. It follows that any line bundle on $\hat{X}$ is generated by $n$ sections. Therefore (by the Swan correspondence) so is any line bundle on $X$, as advertised.

Corollary. For any $c\in H^1(X,{\mathbb Z}/2{\mathbb Z})$, the $n$-fold cup product $c^n\in H^n(X,{\mathbb Z}/2{\mathbb Z})$ is zero.

Proof. $c$ is the first Stiefel-Whitney class of some line bundle $\xi$. Let $\phi_\xi:X\rightarrow {\mathbb RP}^\infty$ be the classifying map of $\xi$. The $n$ sections guaranteed by the theorem provide a factorization of $\phi_\xi$ through ${\mathbb RP}^{n-1}$. But $H^n({\mathbb RP}^{n-1},{\mathbb Z}/2{\mathbb Z})=0$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I look at the paper. Seemingly it is theorem 6.7, and they refer to Bernstein–Ganêa, but I cannot find the later online. Could you please summarize the main techniques? $\endgroup$
    – Z. M
    Commented Nov 26, 2021 at 7:35
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @Z. M: The Bernstein–Ganea paper is available here. $\endgroup$
    – abx
    Commented Nov 26, 2021 at 11:39
16
$\begingroup$

It seems worth giving the cup-length argument, as it's relatively short and sweet.

Suppose $\mathbb{R}P^n=U_1\cup\cdots\cup U_n$, with each $U_i\approx\mathbb{R}^n$, and let $c\in H^1(\mathbb{R}P^n;\mathbb{Z}/2)$ be the generator.

For each $i$ the inclusion-induced map $H^1(\mathbb{R}P^n;\mathbb{Z}/2)\to H^1(U_i;\mathbb{Z}/2)$ is trivial, so by the long exact cohomology sequence of the pair $(\mathbb{R}P^n,U_i)$ there exists a relative cohomology class $c_i\in H^1(\mathbb{R}P^n,U_i;\mathbb{Z}/2)$ whose image in absolute cohomology is $c$. But then by the naturality of relative cup products, $c^n$ is the image of $$ c_1\cdots c_n\in H^n(\mathbb{R}P^n,U_1\cup\cdots\cup U_n;\mathbb{Z}/2)=0, $$ and therefore $c^n=0$, a contradiction.

As Aleksander Milivojevic points out in the comments, the relevant area of topology is the study of Lusternik--Schnirelmann category and related invariants.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .