1
$\begingroup$

Suppose $X\subseteq\mathbb{R}^n$ is a connected open bounded $n$-dimensional submanifold.

1) I wonder if for the class of such spaces there is any upper bound on the LS-category of $X$?

2) Is it known that such a number would be finite, or `countable infinite'?

3) I thought if by adding the boundary points of $X$ to it, we obtain a compact space, then LS-category of $X$ is finite. But, I do not see a proof, although it might be an elementary one.

I am very much new to the LS-category business, and I would appreciate any advise on this, or pointing at any reference or an overview of the subject.

EDIT One special feature that I forgot to add is that I think of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with its Euclidean metric and like the cover to be a cover of convex sets. This is related to a similar question that I have asked a while ago Covering a space by cones

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Could you clarify what you mean by "cover of convex sets"? For instance, an open set of $X$ is of the form $X\cap U$ for $U\subseteq\mathbb{R}^n$, and you might want either $U$ to be convex or $X\cap U$ to be convex. In either case, I'm not sure this has much to do with LS-category. $\endgroup$
    – Mark Grant
    Jan 14, 2018 at 11:37
  • $\begingroup$ @MarkGrant Given a space $X$, I wanted to find (a bound for) the smallest number of convex subsets $C_\alpha\subseteq X$ so that $X=\big cup C_\alpha$. I thought if I take bounded open cones as basis for my topology on $\mathbb{R}^n$, which is equivalent to the standard one, then the LS-category could give a lower bound for this number. But, I know see that this fails, unless I can find some very unusual metric?!? $\endgroup$
    – user51223
    Jan 14, 2018 at 19:20

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

The LS-category of a connected, second countable, n-dimensional manifold satisfies $$cat(X)\le n+1.$$ I suppose this is well known, you find a proof in http://math.ucr.edu/~res/math246A/cuplength.pdf

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the answer. One special feature that I forgot to add is that I think of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with its Euclidean metric and like the cover to be a cover of convex sets. This is related to a similar question that I have asked a while ago Covering a space by cones. $\endgroup$
    – user51223
    Jan 14, 2018 at 8:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.