0
$\begingroup$

I am working with a triangular lattice $L=\{n_1 a_2 + n_2 a_2 : n\in\mathbb{Z}^2 \}$ and $a_1 = \pmatrix{1 \\ 0}$ and $a_2 = \frac{1}{2} \pmatrix{-1 \\ \sqrt{3}}$, and I want to compute the Pontryagin dual of a strip of this lattice, i.e.

$$L_N := \{n_1 a_2 + n_2 a_2 : n_1 \in \mathbb{Z}, n_2 = 0,...,N \} \subset L.$$

It is known that the Pontryagin dual of the triangular lattice is the set of all characters $\chi_k : L \to S^1$ such that $$ \chi_k(x) = e^{ik\cdot x}, \quad x\in L $$ with $k\in B$, where $B$ is the first Brillouin zone of the triangular lattice (or any retiling of it).

It is also know that for a LCA group $G$ and a closed subgroup $H$ of $G$. The Pontryagin dual of $H$ is the quotient $\hat{H} = \hat{G}/H^{\perp}$, where $H^{\perp} = \{\chi \in \hat{G} : \chi(x) = 1\ \forall x\in G\}$.

I was hoping that I could use this train of thought to determine the Pontryagin dual of $L_N$.

It is true that $L_N \subset L$ but $(L_N,+)$ is not a closed subgroup of $(L,+)$ (as thankfully pointed out by @MateuszKwaśnicki) so one cannot apply the above statement to determining the Pontryagin dual of $L_N$.

Question: If $H$ is a quotient group of $G$, i.e. $H = G/Q$ for some $Q$, is there a clear relationship between $\hat{G}$ and $\hat{H}$, as is the case when $H$ is a closed subgroup of $G$?

Any hints on computing the dual of the lattice strip would be much appreciated, as would any references that deal with this sort of theory.

Edit notes: $L_N$ is not a closed subgroup of $L$ but rather a quotient.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe I misunderstood something: as stated, $L_N$ is not a subgroup of $L$. For example, $a_2, N a_2 \in L_N$, but $a_2 + N a_2 \notin L_N$. One can identify $L_N$ with a factor of $L$ (a homomorphic image of $L$) in a number of ways (essentially by identifying $(N+1) a_2$ with $k a_1$ for an arbitrary $k \in \mathbb Z$), and each of these will correspond to some Pontryagin dual, but I am not sure if this is what you meant. $\endgroup$ Sep 14, 2021 at 19:36
  • $\begingroup$ @MateuszKwaśnicki Ah yes, I missed that out. I suspect then $L_N$ is a quotient of $L$ and not a subgroup at all. I wish to identify $(N+1+k)a_2$ with $ka_2$. I am essentially repeating the lattice strips vertically. In which case, I suspect that I cannot use the characters of $L$ to obtain the characters of $L_N$. $\endgroup$
    – spaceman
    Sep 15, 2021 at 13:06
  • $\begingroup$ @MateuszKwaśnicki I have edited the question given your comment. $\endgroup$
    – spaceman
    Sep 15, 2021 at 13:24

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

There's a perfect duality here:

  • If $H$ is a closed subgroup of $G$, then $\hat H$ is canonically isomorphic with $\hat G / H^\perp$, where $H^\perp$ is the set of all characters on $G$ which are equal to one on $H$.

  • If $H = G / Q$ with $Q$ a closed subgroup of $G$, then $\hat H$ is canonically isomorphic with $Q^\perp$, the set of all characters on $G$ which are equal to one on $Q$ (and this set is a closed subgroup of $\hat G$).

See, for example, 1 and the references therein.


Regarding $L_N$, if we identify $(N+1)a_2$ with zero (that is, we consider $L_N$ as the quotient group $L / \{k (N+1) a_2 : k \in \mathbb Z\}$), then $L_N$ is isomorphic to the product group $\mathbb Z \times \mathbb Z_{N+1}$, and so the dual is isomorphic to $\mathbb T \times \mathbb Z_{N+1}$, where $\mathbb T$ is the circle group. The characters on $L_N$ are precisely those characters on $L$ which are equal to one at $(N+1)a_2$. The dual of $L_N$ is graphically represented as follows:

graphical representation of the dual group

In the above image, $N = 2$, vector $a_1$ is shown in purple, $a_2$ in blue, gray area is the Brillouin zone (left) or the fundamental region (right), and three black lines (solid, dashed and dotted) correspond to characters on $\hat L_N$. (Auxiliary red lines demarkate four tiles that can be used to make both pictures.)

Note, however, that we can equally well identify $(N+1)a_2$ with, say, $a_1$ (so that $L_N$ is the quotient group $L / \{k (N+1) a_2 - k a_1 : k \in \mathbb Z\}$). Then $L_N$ is simply isomorphic to $\mathbb Z$, and $\hat L_N$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb T$. The picture now is:

enter image description here

In the above image again $N = 1$, and there is only one black line.


Reference:

1 Pontryagin duality. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Pontryagin_duality&oldid=49720

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Excellent answer, thank you very much for your help. I didn't notice the perfect duality between the groups. I assume this follows by the Pontryagin duality theorem, $\hat{\hat{G}}$ is isomorphic to $G$. Could I ask what tool you used to produce your images? $\endgroup$
    – spaceman
    Sep 19, 2021 at 16:43
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, well, I just manually listed the geometric primitives in Mathematica. :-) Would you like the source code? I think I still have it somewhere. $\endgroup$ Sep 19, 2021 at 16:51
  • $\begingroup$ I see, didn't know you could do that with Mathematica either. Learn something new everyday. If you wouldn't mind providing it, that would be great. If it is too difficult to find/has been deleted, then no worries :-). $\endgroup$
    – spaceman
    Sep 19, 2021 at 17:00
  • $\begingroup$ I realise it is pretty ugly... I uploaded it to pastebin.com if you like to use it anyway. $\endgroup$ Sep 19, 2021 at 17:27
  • $\begingroup$ It looks great, thank you very much :-) $\endgroup$
    – spaceman
    Sep 19, 2021 at 17:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.