7
$\begingroup$

I'm looking at chapter 4 of Waterhouse's "Abelian varieties over finite fields"; and Theorems 4.1 and 4.2 seem to use the following fact:

Suppose that $E/\mathbb{F}_q$ is an elliptic curve over a finite field with $q=p^n$ elements and let $\pi_E$ denote the $q$th-power Frobenius map acting on $E$. Suppose that $\pi_E$ does not act like multiplication-by-$N$ for any integer $N$ so that $\pi_E = [\alpha]_E$ where $\alpha$ is a root of the polynomial $$x^2 - \mathrm{tr}(\pi_E)x + q$$ Then $E$ is ordinary if and only if $p$ is splits in $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$.

Waterhouse uses some very general theory (namely a theorem of Honda/Tate and the general theory of abelian varieties) and I find his reasoning/terminology vague. Does anybody know of a more down to earth proof for this result?

Lang has a proof utilitizing the fact that $End(E)\to End(T_p(E))$ is injective; but i'm trying to find proofs that don't use local methods

EDIT: Update on attempt: Here is a proof attempt; perhaps someone can help me finish it off.

We prove $E$ is supersingular if and only if $p$ is non-split in $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$.

First suppose that $p$ is non-split. If $p$ is inert, then since $\alpha$ has norm $q = p^n$, it follows that $p$ divides $(\alpha)$ and so $E[p]\subseteq E[\pi_E] = \{O \}$; thus $E$ is supersingular. If $p$ ramifies then $p$ divides the discriminant of $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$ and so $p$ divides $\mathrm{tr}(\pi_E)^2 - 4q$, which implies that $p$ divides $\mathrm{tr}(\pi_E)$ and so $E$ is supersingular;

Conversely, suppose that $E$ is supersingular. Suppose that $p$ splits as $(p) = \mathfrak{p}\overline{\mathfrak{p}}$. Then $(\alpha) = \mathfrak{p}^a\overline{\mathfrak{p}}^b$ where $a+b=n$. However, since $E$ is supersingular $\alpha^N \in \mathbb{Z}$ for some positive integer $N$. Which implies that $(\alpha)^N = \mathfrak{p}^{Na}\overline{\mathfrak{p}}^{Nb}$ and so $Na=Nb$ since $(\alpha^N) = \overline{(\alpha^N)}$. Therefore $a=b$ and so $(\alpha) = \mathfrak{p}^a \overline{\mathfrak{p}}^a = (p^a)$ where $a=n/2$. This implies that $\alpha = \zeta p^{a}$ for some unit $\zeta$. This is where I am stuck.

Any help would be appreciated.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think it's possible to finish the argument from where you are because you need to rule out polynomials like $x^2 - \sqrt{q} x + q$ for $p$ congruent to $1$ mod $3$ and $q$ a square, but roots $\alpha$ of these polynomials satisfy the condition $\alpha^N \in \mathbb Z$. So you need more information about elliptic curves. $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Commented Jul 23, 2021 at 19:15
  • $\begingroup$ That's exactly where I get stuck; I would like to know what extra information could finish off the proof. $\endgroup$
    – Rdrr
    Commented Jul 23, 2021 at 19:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The way I see how to do it is to observe that the endomorphism algebra is a quaternion algebra, and (by the $\ell$-adic Tate module) split at each prime $\ell$ not $p$. If $\mathbb Q(\alpha)$ is split at $p$ then it is split everywhere, hence a matrix algebra, thus contains nilpotents, which is absurd. Is this the argument of Lang you mention? I don't see a better way. $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Commented Jul 23, 2021 at 21:23

2 Answers 2

5
+300
$\begingroup$

Here is a solution that avoids explicit use of $\mathbf{Q}_p$ and in particular does not require knowing that $(\operatorname{End} E) \otimes \mathbf{Q}_p$ is a division ring. The key is to use inseparable degree of endomorphisms.

Identify $\alpha$ with $\pi_E$. Let $a = \operatorname{tr} \alpha \in \mathbf{Z}$. Let $\mathcal{O}$ be the ring of integers of $\mathbf{Q}(\alpha)$. Let $\mathcal{O}' := (\operatorname{End} E) \cap \mathbf{Q}(\alpha)$. For $\beta \in \mathcal{O}'$, the inseparable degree $\deg_{\text{i}} \beta$ is multiplicative in $\beta$. The $\beta \in \mathcal{O}'$ with $\deg_{\text{i}} \beta \ge p^m$ are the $\beta$ that factor through the $p^m$-power Frobenius morphism $F_m \colon E \to E^{(p^m)}$; they form an additive subgroup. Thus $\beta \mapsto \log_p \deg_{\text{i}} \beta$ defines a valuation $v \colon \mathcal{O}' \to \mathbf{Z} \cup \{\infty\}$. Extend $v$ to the fraction field $\mathbf{Q}(\alpha)$.

Case 1: $E$ is ordinary. Then $p \nmid a$, so $x^2-ax+q$ mod $p$ has two distinct factors, so $p$ splits in $\mathbf{Q}(\alpha)$.

Case 2: $E$ is supersingular. Then $p \mid a$, so the equality $\alpha^2 - a \alpha + q = 0$ yields $\alpha^2 \in p \mathcal{O}$.

First consider the case $\mathcal{O}'=\mathcal{O}$. If $\beta \in \mathcal{O}$ satisfies $v(\beta) \ge 2n$, then $\beta$ factors through $F_{2n} = \alpha^2 \in p \mathcal{O}$, so $\beta \in p \mathcal{O}$. This implication for all $\beta$ shows that $v$ is the unique place above $p$.

In general, write $(\mathcal{O}:\mathcal{O}')=p^e d$ with $p \nmid d$. If $\beta \in \mathcal{O}$ satisfies $v(\beta) \ge (e+1)2n$, then the endomorphism $(p^e d) \beta$ is divisible (in $\mathcal{O}'$ or in $\mathcal{O}$) by $\alpha^{2(e+1)}$ and hence by $p^{e+1}$, but $p \nmid d$, so $\beta \in p\mathcal{O}$. Again, this shows that $v$ is the unique place above $p$.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ This is a wonderful proof. If you wouldn't mind I'd like some clarification on why $v(\beta)\geq 2n$ implies that $v$ is the only place above $p$. $\endgroup$
    – Rdrr
    Commented Jul 28, 2021 at 14:26
  • $\begingroup$ @Rdrr If $v$ is not the only place above $p$, choose some element which is $0$ modulo $v$ but not zero modulo the other place above $p$, and then take a high power, for a contradiction. $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Commented Jul 28, 2021 at 17:45
  • $\begingroup$ I must be missing a basic algebraic number theory fact. How does one get a contradiction from a high power? $\endgroup$
    – Rdrr
    Commented Jul 28, 2021 at 19:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Rdrr: Here is another way to say it. Let $\mathfrak{p}$ be the prime corresponding to $v$. The implication $v(\beta) \ge 2n \implies \beta \in (p)$ is equivalent to $\mathfrak{p}^{2n} \subset (p)$, which is the same as saying that $(p)$ divides $\mathfrak{p}^{2n}$. In this case, the factorization of the $\mathcal{O}$-ideal $(p)$ cannot involve any primes other than $\mathfrak{p}$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 3:28
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much Bjorn. This is a very insightful proof. $\endgroup$
    – Rdrr
    Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 14:46
4
$\begingroup$

Here is a proof that does not use the Honda-Tate theory.

Notice that the quadratic field $K=Q(\alpha)$ may be viewed as the subfield of the endomorphism algebra $End^0(E)=End(E)\otimes Q$ with the same identity element. Here $End(E)$ is the algebra of ALL endomorphisms of $E$ over an algebraic closure of $F_q$.

  1. Suppose that $E$ is ordinary and $T_p(E)$ is its physical $p$-adic Tate module, which is a free $Z_p$-module of rank 1. Let us consider the corresponding $Q_p$-vector space $V_p(E)=T_p(E)\otimes_{Z_p}Q_p$, which is a one-dimensional vector space over the field $Q_p$ of $p$-adic numbers.

By functoriality, there is the natural $Q_p$-algebra homomomorphism

$$K_p=K\otimes_Q Q_p \to End_{Q_p}(V_p(E))=Q_p,$$ which sends $1$ to $1$ and therefore is not zero. Since $K_p$ has $Q_p$-dimension $2>1$, this homomorphism is not injective and therefore $K_p$ is NOT a field, i.e., $p$ splits in $K=Q(\alpha)$.

  1. Suppose that $E$ is supersingular. Then $$End(E)\otimes Q_p=End^0(E)\otimes_Q Q_p$$ is a division algebra over $Q_p$ of dimension 4 that contains $K_p=K\otimes_Q Q_p$ as a $Q_p$-subalgebra. Since $End^0(E)\otimes_Q Q_p$ has no zero divisors, $K_p$ also has no zero divisors, i.e., $p$ does NOT split in $K=Q(\alpha)$.
$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ How do you check that the endomorphism algebra in the supersingular case is a division algebra over $\mathbb Q_p$? I sketched one way in the comments, but it's not (to me) obvious. $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Commented Jul 24, 2021 at 14:54
  • $\begingroup$ Your suggestion works just fine. I may only add that since $E$ is a simple abelian variety, its endomorphism algebra has no zero divisors and therefore cannot be isomorphic to the matrix algebra of size 2 over the rationals. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 24, 2021 at 15:11
  • $\begingroup$ @WillSawin This is essentially the proof in Lang's Elliptic functions. I was hoping for a proof without limits, but one may not exists. This seems to be a good way to link the characteristic zero info (the splitting of $p$) with the mod p information (the p-torsion). $\endgroup$
    – Rdrr
    Commented Jul 26, 2021 at 16:28
  • $\begingroup$ @Rdrr What do you mean by "limits" in this context? $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Commented Jul 26, 2021 at 16:57
  • $\begingroup$ Limits in the categorical sense; the limits involved in the definitions of $\mathbb{Q}_p = \lim \mathbb{Z}/p^n$ and $T_p(E)= \lim E[p^n]$. $\endgroup$
    – Rdrr
    Commented Jul 26, 2021 at 17:01

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .