2
$\begingroup$

Let $(\mathbb R^{1+2},\eta)$ be Minkowski with the metric $\eta= -dt^2+(dx^1)^2+(dx^2)^2$. Suppose $\Sigma$ is a smooth timelike hypersurface and denote by $h$ the second fundamental form on $\Sigma$. Assume that $$ h(N,N) \geq 0 \quad \forall N\in L_p\Sigma \quad \text{and}\quad p \in \Sigma,$$ where $L_p\Sigma= \{N \in T_p\Sigma\,:\, \eta(N,N)=0\}$. Assume also that there is no point $p$ on $\Sigma$ with the property that $h(N,N)>0$ for all nontrivial $N \in L_p\Sigma$. Does it follow that $\Sigma$ is part of a hyperboloid?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I know nothing about Minkowski geometry, but might the horizontal plane $\{ t = 0 \}$ work? This would have second fundamental form zero, no? $\endgroup$
    – Leo Moos
    Commented Jun 28, 2021 at 18:05
  • $\begingroup$ @LeoMoos: I think the OP would prefer a vertical plane $\{x^1 = 0\}$. :-) (This makes it time like, and so $L_p\Sigma \neq \{0\}$.) $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 28, 2021 at 18:28

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

By hyperboloid, you seem to mean the one-sheeted surface $\{ |x|^2 - t^2 = 1\}$; this surface is umbilical with the induced metric proportional to the mean curvature, and so $h(N,N) = 0$ for all $N\in L_p\Sigma$.

Before answering your question, a couple comments:

  1. It is meaningless to specify $h(N,N) \geq 0$ with a particular sign: the choice of the sign of the mean curvature scalar depends on the choice of orientation of the surface.
  2. If you have a time-like surface in $\mathbb{R}^{2,1}$, the set $L_p\Sigma$ is the union of two lines. Locally (and in fact globally under mild assumptions) there exists two non-vanishing linearly independent vector fields $\ell, n$ generating $L_p\Sigma$. Your requirements is essentially stating that $h(\ell,\ell)h(n,n) = 0$ and $h(\ell,\ell)+h(n,n)$ is signed.

Certainly it is not necessary for $\Sigma$ to be part of the hyperboloid for this to hold. As Leo Moos pointing out in the comment, just taking $\Sigma$ to be a time-like hyperplane guarantees that $h \equiv 0$ and hence your requirement is satisfied. More generally, if you take any time-like surface $\Sigma$ with the property that it is ruled by null lines, then this guarantees one of $h(\ell,\ell)$ or $h(n,n)$ vanishes identically. It then suffices to bend the surface so that the other family of null curves accelerate only in one way.

For example: you can let $\Sigma$ be the graph $\{x^1 = f(t, x^2)\}$ where $f(t,x^2) = g(t - x^2)$ with $|g'| < 1$ and $g'' \geq 0$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I agree with your comment about orientation and (2) is in fact the right way to formulate my question. I see also that my conclusion was a bit naive. But perhaps is it correct to say that the assumptions (2) imply that one of h(l,l) or h(n,n) must vanish globally on Sigma? $\endgroup$
    – Ali
    Commented Jun 28, 2021 at 18:54
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think so. It should be possible to have two regions, one with $h(l,l) \neq 0$ and one with $h(n,n) \neq 0$ glued together with a region on which both vanish. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 29, 2021 at 2:09

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .