1
$\begingroup$

I am wondering if there is an extreme value distribution that is closed under both the minimum and the maximum operation. For example, for there is a Gumbel maximum distribution closed under the maximum (provided $\beta$ is the same for both distributions). Also there is the Gumbel minimum distribution closed under minimum. However, I am interested in a distribution that is closed under both such that, given two distributions $X_1,X_2$, I can find $Y_1=\min(X_1,X_2)$ and $Y_2=\max(X_1,X_2)$, which are of the same kind of distribution. If it only holds in special cases (except the trivial case if iid) that would also be interesting.

I imagine that it is possible that no such kind of distribution exists, in which case my question is why this does not exist / if there is a proof that it cannot exist.

Thank you.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

First, a few comments to make sure I understand the question correctly:

  • I believe the correct wording is "stabie under maxima/minima" or "max/min-stable" rather than "closed". (Similarly, I think "same kind of distribution" is not widely used, a more standard term would be "distribution of the same type".)

  • Max-stable and min-stable distributions are completely described; see, for example, the Wikipedia entry on Generalized extreme value distribution.

The distribution of $X$ is min-stable if and only if the distribution of $-X$ is max-stable. So the question boils down to finding a max-stable distribution with CDF $F(x)$ such that $1-F(-x)$ is a CDF of a max-stable distribution, too.

By the extreme value theorem, we necessarily have $F(x) = \exp(-t(x))$ with either \[ t(x) = e^{-(x-\mu) / \sigma} \qquad \text{or} \qquad t(x) = (1 + \xi \tfrac{x-\mu}{\sigma})^{-1/\xi}\] on the support of $X$. It is now a simple exercise to verify that $1 - F(-x)$ is not of the same form (the behaviour of $1 - F(-x)$ at $\infty$ or at the finite end of the support is wrong), so there are no non-trivial solutions.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer. Also, thanks for taking the time to correct my wording, this is very helpful! $\endgroup$ Commented May 23, 2021 at 17:33

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .