0
$\begingroup$

Hey, what is the probability density function of the following random variable $\theta$ : $\theta=tan^{-1}\frac{Y_1-Y_2}{X_1-X_2}$ for $X_1-X_2>0$ and $\theta=tan^{-1}\frac{Y_1-Y_2}{X_1-X_2}+\pi$ for $X_1-X_2<0$. $X_1,X_2,Y_1,Y_2$ are all uniformly distributed random variables in the range 0 to 1. I arrived to this question when I was trying to find out the pdf of the angle between two randomly positioned nodes $(X_1,Y_1)$ and $(Y_1,Y_2)$. So basically I've 2 questions:(1). $X_1-X_2$ and $Y_1-Y_2$ have triangular distribution between -1 to +1. But their ratio distribution is difficult to find because the denominator takes 0 value outside the range (-1,+1). So, I attempted to approximate this triangular by a Gaussian of variance $\frac{1}{9}.$ Now, ratio distribution of 2 Gaussian is Cauchy and then by taking $tan^{-1}$ of that I got a uniform density function $\frac{1}{\pi}$ between $-\frac{\pi}{2}$ to $\frac{\pi}{2}$. Am I doing anything wrong in this? And, my 2nd ques (2). $tan^{-1}\frac{Y}{X}$ takes values only between $-\frac{\pi}{2}$ to $\frac{\pi}{2}$. So, for -ve $X$, I was adding a $+\pi$(See the 2$^{nd}$ line in the question). How does that reflect in the final pdf? The final pdf that I've obtained is only between $-\frac{\pi}{2}$ to $\frac{\pi}{2}$. Pls help.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think you should approximate anything like this by a Gaussian. There is no CLT involved. $\endgroup$ Mar 24, 2013 at 16:40
  • $\begingroup$ I'm definitely not using CLT. I'm approximating a triangular distribution by a Gaussian by adjusting its variance such that 99% of its mass lie in the (-1,+1) range. How else do you suggest me to find the pdf of $tan^{-1}\frac{Y_1-Y_2}{X_1-X_2}$? $\endgroup$
    – Prakash
    Mar 24, 2013 at 18:10
  • $\begingroup$ Okay, you're not using CLT, but the criticism remains valid: "approximating" the triangular distribution by a Gaussian changes the problem more or less completely. $\endgroup$ Mar 24, 2013 at 20:12

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

First, you should probably solve the problem first without the two cases and the $+\pi$; the symmetry of switching $(X_1,Y_1)$ with $(X_2,Y_2)$ will allow you to convert your answer to the simpler problem - some pdf $f(x)$ supported on $(-\frac\pi2,\frac\pi2)$ - to the answer you're really looking for - which will be $\frac12f(x) + \frac12f(x-\pi)$.

Second, I recommend trying to find the probability density function $g(x)$ for $\frac YX$, given that $X$ and $Y$ are independent random variables both with the triangle distribution on $(-1,1)$ - this is a ratio distribution. Afterwards you can adjust your answer to accommodate the $\tan^{-1}$ function: the resulting probability density function will be $g(\tan^{-1} x)/(1+x^2)$.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

The way I was calculating the pdf of $Z=\frac{Y}{X}$ where $X$ and $Y$ are independent r.v. with triangular distribution in the range $(-1,1)$ is as follows :

\begin{align*} F_Z(z)=Pr(\frac{Y}{X}\leq z)=\displaystyle\int_{-1}^1 Pr(Y\leq xz)f_X(x)dx=\displaystyle\int_{-1}^1\int_{-1}^{min(xz,1)}f_Y(y)f_X(x)dydx \end{align*} Now, I calculate $Pr(Y\leq xz)$ as follows :\\ $\underline{z>0}$: [ Pr(Y\leq xz) = \begin{cases} \displaystyle\int_{-1}^{xz}(1+y)dy & \text{if } -\frac{1}{z} < x < 0 \\ \displaystyle\int_{-1}^0 (1+y)dy + \displaystyle\int_0^{xz} (1-y)dy & \text{if } 0 < x < \frac{1}{z}\\ 1 & \frac{1}{z} < x < 1 \end{cases} ]

$\underline{z\leq 0}$: [ Pr(Y\leq xz) = \begin{cases} \displaystyle\int_{-1}^{xz}(1+y)dy & \text{if } -\frac{1}{z} \geq x \geq 0 \\ \displaystyle\int_{-1}^0 (1+y)dy + \displaystyle\int_0^{xz} (1-y)dy & \text{if } 0 > x \geq \frac{1}{z}\\ 1 & -1 \leq x \leq \frac{1}{z} \end{cases} ]

Thus, $Pr(Y\leq xz)$ becomes :\ [ Pr(Y\leq xz) = \begin{cases} xz+\frac{x^2z^2}{2}+\frac{1}{2} & \text{if } -\frac{1}{z} \geq x \geq 0, z > 0 \ xz-\frac{x^2z^2}{2}+\frac{1}{2} & \text{if } 0 < x < \frac{1}{z}, z > 0 \ 1 & \text{if } \frac{1}{z} < x < 1, z>0 \ xz+\frac{x^2z^2}{2}+\frac{1}{2} & \text{if } 0 \geq x \geq -\frac{1}{z}, z < 0 \ xz-\frac{x^2z^2}{2}+\frac{1}{2} & \text{if } \frac{1}{z} < x < 0, z < 0 \ 1 & \text{if } -1 < x < \frac{1}{z}, z<0 \

\end{cases} ]

Then, plugging in these values of $Pr(Y\leq xz)$ in the expression of $F_Z(z)$, I obtain :\ [ F_Z(z) = \begin{cases} \displaystyle\int_{min(-1,-\frac{1}{z})}^0(xz+\frac{x^2z^2}{2}+\frac{1}{2})(1+x)dx + \displaystyle\int_0^\frac{1}{z}(xz-\frac{x^2z^2}{2}+\frac{1}{2})(1-x)dx + \displaystyle\int_{\frac{1}{z}}^1 1.(1-x)dx & \text{if } z>0 \\ \displaystyle\int_0^{-\frac{1}{z}}(xz+\frac{x^2z^2}{2}+\frac{1}{2})(1+x)dx + \displaystyle\int_{\frac{1}{z}}^0(xz-\frac{x^2z^2}{2}+\frac{1}{2})(1-x)dx + \displaystyle\int_{-1}^{\frac{1}{z}} 1.(1-x)dx & \text{if } z \leq 0 \end{cases} ] So, now there are 3 cases for z: $0<z<1$, $1<z<\infty$ and $z\leq 0$\\ $\therefore$ Value of $F_Z(z)$ for each of these cases is as follows :\\ $\textbf{Case 1}$: $0<z<1$\ $\displaystyle\int_{-\frac{1}{z}}^0(xz+\frac{x^2z^2}{2}+\frac{1}{2})(1+x)dx + \displaystyle\int_0^\frac{1}{z}(xz-\frac{x^2z^2}{2}+\frac{1}{2})(1-x)dx + \displaystyle\int_{\frac{1}{z}}^1 1.(1-x)dx$\\ $\textbf{Case 2}$: $z>1$\ $\displaystyle\int_{-1}^0(xz+\frac{x^2z^2}{2}+\frac{1}{2})(1+x)dx + \displaystyle\int_0^\frac{1}{z}(xz-\frac{x^2z^2}{2}+\frac{1}{2})(1-x)dx + \displaystyle\int_{\frac{1}{z}}^1 1.(1-x)dx$\\ $\textbf{Case 3}$: $z\leq 0$\ $\displaystyle\int_0^{-\frac{1}{z}}(xz+\frac{x^2z^2}{2}+\frac{1}{2})(1+x)dx + \displaystyle\int_{\frac{1}{z}}^0(xz-\frac{x^2z^2}{2}+\frac{1}{2})(1-x)dx + \displaystyle\int_{-1}^{\frac{1}{z}} 1.(1-x)dx$

I don't know where exactly I'm going wrong ! But I'm calculating this in the same line as the ratio of 2 uniform r.v. which is coming same as given in Wiki.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.