3
$\begingroup$

Let $f\in\mathcal{S}(\mathbb{R}^n)$, Schwartz class. Consider the function $g$ defined on $[0,\infty)$ by $$g(r)=\int_{S^{n-1}}f(rw)d\mu(w),$$ where $d\mu$ is the normalised surface measure of $S^{n-1}.$

1)Is $\sup_r|r^kg(r)|<\infty,$ for any $k\in\mathbb{N}$?

  1. Is $g\in\mathcal{S}([0,\infty))?$

Answer of only (1) will also be appreciated.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Doesn't this follow immediately from writing $|f(rw)| \le C r^{k}$, since $\mu(S^{n+1})$ is a constant? And you should get (2) by differentiating under the integral sign enough times. $\endgroup$ – Nate Eldredge Apr 17 at 3:02
  • $\begingroup$ How to play with $w^k$ inside the integration? Also we should be careful that when we write $w^k$ then $k$ is a multi index. $\endgroup$ – Wilderness Apr 17 at 3:15
  • $\begingroup$ I thought this way but messed up with $w^k$ and multi index. Can you please answer in answer section as that will be more helpful for me to understand? $\endgroup$ – Wilderness Apr 17 at 3:34
  • $\begingroup$ What's the exact definition of $\mathcal{S}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ that you are using? $\endgroup$ – Nate Eldredge Apr 17 at 3:49
  • $\begingroup$ I used the definition exactly from here:en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwartz_space $\endgroup$ – Wilderness Apr 17 at 3:54
4
$\begingroup$

Wikipedia's definition of the Schwartz class is a bit awkward and I think that is causing some of the difficulty. They define $f \in \mathcal{S}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ if $$\sup_{x \in \mathbb{R}^n} |x^\beta D^\alpha f| < \infty \label{1}\tag{*}$$ for all multi-indices $\alpha, \beta$. A more convenient equivalent definition, found in e.g. Folland's Real Analysis, is to have $$\sup_{x \in \mathbb{R}^n} |(1+|x|)^k D^\alpha f| < \infty \label{2}\tag{**}$$ for all multi-indices $\alpha$ and positive integers $k$.

With definition \eqref{2} your (1) becomes easy, writing $$|r^k g(r)| \le \int_{S^{n-1}} r^k |f(rw)|\,d\mu(w)$$ and noting $$r^k |f(rw)| \le (1+r)^k |f(rw)| = \left|(1+|rw|)^k f(rw)\right|$$ which by assumption is bounded. You should also be able to get (2) by differentiating under the integral sign and noting that $\frac{d^m}{dr^m} f(rw)$ can be written in terms of the partial derivatives of $f$ up to order $m$, with coefficients involving the coordinates of $w$ which are all bounded by 1.

To see \eqref{1} and \eqref{2} are equivalent, it suffices to take $\alpha=0$. Suppose \eqref{1} holds. It suffices to prove \eqref{2} for even $k$, so replace $k$ by $2k$. Since $1+|x| \le C (1+|x|^2)^{1/2}$ for some universal $C$, it is enough to show $\sup_x |(1+|x|^2)^k f| < \infty$. But $(1+|x|^2)^k$ is a polynomial in $x$ of degree $2k$, so it can be written as a linear combination of monomials $x^\beta$ which can be controlled by \eqref{1}.

Conversely, if \eqref{2} holds, note that $|x_i^{\beta_i}| = |x_i|^{\beta_i} \le (1+|x|)^{\beta_i}$, since $|x_i| \le |x| \le 1+|x|$. So $$|x^\beta| = |x_1^{\beta_1} \dots x_n^{\beta_n}| \le (1+|x|)^{\beta_1 + \dots + \beta_n}$$ which can be controlled by \eqref{1}.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you sir. The alternative definition makes it quite easy. I was struck because of $w^k,$ which may not was in $S^{n-1}$ $\endgroup$ – Wilderness Apr 17 at 8:26
1
$\begingroup$

This has already an impeccable answer but there is also a more abstract approach which is quite enlightening, displays the underlying symmetry behind the result and might be of interest. You have the following ingredients:

  1. A Hilbert space—-$L^2$ of euclidean $n$-space (one for each $n$);

  2. A self-adjoint operator $T$ (unbounded) thereon (the usual Schrödinger operator with quadratic potential);

  3. A compact transformation group (the linear isometries of euclidean space) which commutes with $T$ and which provides an averaging process to project the Hilbert space in the $n$-dimensional to the case of the real line;

  4. A Fréchet space (the Schwartz space) which is closely related to the above structures—-it is the interesection of the domains of definition of the powers of $T$, with the corresponding l.c. topology as a countable intersection of Hilbert spaces (Pietsch).

It is then just an exercise to create a proof which works in this abstract situation. This of course specialises to a myriad of other special cases which could be interesting.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Wow that is very interesting. Can you please provide some references $\endgroup$ – Wilderness Apr 17 at 8:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.