0
$\begingroup$

I am looking for a dense sub-algebra $B$ in $C_{b}((0,1))$ in uniform topology such that it satisfy following requirements:

  1. $B\cap C^{\infty}_{b}((0,1))=\mathbb{R}$ (No polynomial, no bump function).

$(0,1)$ can be replaced with other connected open set. The only thing I can come up with is nowhere differentiable function union with $\mathbb{R}$, but I don't know if they form a sub-algebra.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Since $0$ is not nowhere differentiable, the nowhere differentiable functions do not form a subalgebra. What does "other connected open set is fine" mean? $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Feb 12, 2021 at 18:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If $f$ and $g$ are positive with $f$ nowhere differentiable and $g$ smooth, then $g/f$ is nowhere differentiable but $f\cdot g/f$ is smooth, so what you describe is not an algebra. $\endgroup$
    – Pierre PC
    Commented Feb 12, 2021 at 19:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I would think of something like starting with a single function $f$ which is strictly increasing and not differentiable, and consider the algebra it generates, which is the set of all polynomials in $f$. By Stone-Weierstrass it will be dense. The question is then in effect whether $p(f)$ could be smooth and non-constant for some polynomial $p$. It seems unlikely. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 12, 2021 at 20:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @NateEldredge I think the argument in my answer is enough to show that such $p$ does not exist. However, I am not sure $\mathbb R[f]$ in dense, since the underlying space is not compact, and we do not assume the functions are zero at infinity. $\endgroup$
    – Pierre PC
    Commented Feb 12, 2021 at 21:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Oh, good point. It would be dense in $C([0,1])$ but of course $C_b((0,1))$ contains functions which do not continuously extend to $[0,1]$, so it cannot approximate such functions. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 12, 2021 at 21:37

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Such a subalgebra can be defined. See also the end of this answer for a more general result.

Let $I=(0,1)$. In the following, an open interval means a nonempty open interval of $I$. Fix a function $f\in C_b(I)$ with values in $[1,2]$ such that $f$ is not smooth over any open interval; for instance, $f:t\mapsto\alpha W(t)+\beta$, for $W$ a realisation of Brownian motion. Set $B$ the subset of $C_b(I)$ consisting of functions of the form $$a_nf^n+\cdots+a_1f+a_0,$$ with $a_1,\ldots,a_n$ smooth and $a_0$ constant. $B$ is clearly a subalbegra of $C_b(I)$. We need to show that it is dense, and that its smooth functions have to be constants.

The following fact follows from considering a smooth partition of unity over $I$.

Fact. Given $h,\delta\in C_b(I)$ such that $\delta>0$ over $I$, there exists $\tilde h\in C^\infty(I)$ such that $|h-\tilde h|<\delta$ over $I$.

In particular, it will be enough to show that the closure of $B$ in $C_b(I)$ contains all smooth functions. Let $g$ be a smooth function of $C_b(I)$ and $\varepsilon>0$. We are looking for a function in $B$ within distance $\varepsilon$ of $g$. Using the above fact, let $\tilde f\in C^\infty(I)$ such that $2|f-\tilde f|<\min(1,\varepsilon/|g|)$. Of course $\tilde f\geq f-|f-\tilde f|\geq 1/2$. Then $$ \left|g-\frac g{\tilde f}f\right|\leq\frac{|g|}{|\tilde f|}\cdot|\tilde f-f|<\frac{|g|}{1/2}\cdot\frac\varepsilon{2|g|}=\varepsilon,$$ so $g$ is at distance at most $\varepsilon$ of $(g/\tilde f)f\in B$, which concludes the density argument.

To show that smooth functions of $B$ are constant, here is a lemma that we'll prove later.

Lemma. If $h\in C_b(I)$, $b_n,\ldots,b_0\in C^\infty(I)$ and $h(x)$ is a root of $b_n(x)z^n+\cdots+b_0(x)$ for all $x\in I$, then either $h$ is smooth over an open interval of $I$ or the $b_i$ are all zero everywhere.

Choose some $g\in B$. We can write it as $a_nf^n+\cdots+a_1f+a_0$ for $a_1,\ldots,a_n$ smooth and $a_0$ constant. Now if $g$ is smooth, then $f(x)$ is a root of $a_n(x)z^n+\cdots+a_1(x)z+(a_0-g)(x)$ for all $x$, with all coefficients smooth. Since $f$ is not smooth over any open interval of $I$, the above lemma shows that all coefficients of this polynomial are zero, and in particular $g=a_0$ is a constant.

It remains to prove the lemma. I will work by induction over $n$. If $n=0$, the result is obvious since $b_0$ has to be zero everywhere. Suppose the result is true for a given $n$, and let us show it is true for $n+1$.

Let $h$ and $b_{n+1},\ldots b_0$ be as assumed in the lemma.

  1. If there exists an $x_0$ such that $h(x_0)$ is a simple root of $b_{n+1}(x_0)z^{n+1}+\cdots+b_0(x_0)$, a classical application of the inverse function theorem shows that $h(x)$ depends smoothly on the vector $(b_0(x),\ldots,b_{n+1}(x))$, which itself depends smoothly on $x$, so $h$ is smooth over a neighbourhood of $x_0$.

  2. If such an $x_0$ does not exist, it means that for all $x$, $h(x)$ is a root of the derivative $(n+1)b_{n+1}(x)z^n+\cdots+2b_2(x)z+b_1(x)$. By the induction hypothesis, either $h$ is smooth on an open interval and we are done, or all functions $b_1$ to $b_{n+1}$ are zero everywhere. Since $h(x)$ is now a root of the constant polynomial $b_0(x)$ for all $x$, $b_0$ is zero as well, which concludes.


Let us rewrite that result in an abstract-ish context. Let $X$ be a topological space, and $\mathcal S\subset C(X)$ a certain notion of regularity; in the above case, $X=(0,1)$ and $\mathcal S=C^\infty(X)$. Suppose the following three conditions are met.

  1. $\mathcal S$ is a local notion of regularity, in the sense that a function $f\in C(X)$ is of regularity $\mathcal S$ if $f_{|U}$ is of regularity $\mathcal S$ for all $U$ in an open cover of $X$ (for instance, not globally Lipschitz but rather locally Lipschitz). In technical terms, $\mathcal S$ should come from a subsheaf of $U\mapsto C(U)$. Moreover, for all $s_1,\ldots,s_k\in\mathcal S$ and $g\in C^\infty(\mathbb R^k)$, one should have $g\circ (s_1,\ldots,s_k)\in\mathcal S$. In particular, $\mathcal S$ is an algebra, and $g/h\in\mathcal S$ if $g,h\in\mathcal S$, $h>0$.

  2. The above fact should still hold: given $h,\delta\in C_b(X)$ such that $\delta>0$ over $I$, there exists $\tilde h\in \mathcal S$ such that $|h-\tilde h|<\delta$ over $X$. In particular, $\tilde h$ is bounded. This holds if $\mathcal S$ admits partitions of unity (a property sometimes known as $\mathcal S$-paracompactness); as described in Theorem 16.2 of The Convenient Setting of Global Analysis by Kriegl and Michor, it is enough to have $X$ paracompact and $\mathcal S$ separating for closed sets (given $F_0,F_1\subset X$ disjont closed sets, there exists $f\in\mathcal S$ such that $f_{|F_i}=i$).

  3. There should exist $f\in C_b(X)$ such that $f_{|U}$ is never of regularity $\mathcal S$, for $U\subset X$ a nonempty open subset.

Then the reasoning above shows that there exists a dense subalgebra $B\subset C_b(X)$ such that $B\cap\mathcal S$ contains only constants.

For instance, for any second countable metric space $(X,d)$, there exists a dense subalgebra $B\subset C_b(X)$ such that the only locally Hölder functions of $B$ ($\forall x,\exists\varepsilon,a,M>0,\forall y,z\in B_x(\varepsilon),|h(z)-h(y)|\leq Md(y,z)^a$) are constant. Indeed, setting $\mathcal S$ the local Hölder regularity, the first point is not difficult, and the second one is done using $\mathcal S$-paracompactness (consider the locally Lipschitz function $x\mapsto d(x,F_1)/(d(x,F_0)+d(x,F_1))$). We can deal with the third point using a Baire-type argument, noting that the set $$ A(x,\varepsilon,M) = \lbrace h\in C_b(X):\forall y,d(x,y)<\varepsilon\Rightarrow|h(y)-h(x)|\leq-1/\ln d(x,y) \rbrace $$ is closed with empty interior, and that a function that is locally Hölder over a nonempty open subset of $X$ has to belong to some $A(x_k,2^{-\ell})$, where $\lbrace x_0,x_1,\ldots\rbrace$ is a dense subset of $X$.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ @NateEldredge The $a_i$ are smooth functions, not constants. $\endgroup$
    – Pierre PC
    Commented Feb 12, 2021 at 21:28
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, thanks. Now it makes more sense. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 12, 2021 at 21:29
  • $\begingroup$ @NateEldredge No problem, thank you for your interest. :) $\endgroup$
    – Pierre PC
    Commented Feb 12, 2021 at 21:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Ken.Wong I don't think so? If $g$ were precisely equal to $(g/\tilde f)f$, then we could apply the lemma, but that is not the case. The difference between these two functions is not smooth. $\endgroup$
    – Pierre PC
    Commented Feb 13, 2021 at 15:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $B$ is not an ideal, except in $\mathbb R[f]$ or something like that. The density argument relies on $C^\infty(I)$ being dense in $C_b(I)$, which is more or less the fact above. The fact that $(g/\tilde f)f$ is in $B$ comes from the definition of $B$, with $a_1=g/\tilde f$. $\endgroup$
    – Pierre PC
    Commented Feb 13, 2021 at 16:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .