3
$\begingroup$

$\DeclareMathOperator\SU{SU}$Let $M$ be a coadjoint orbit of dimension 6 of $\SU(3)$, and let $T$ be the maximal torus in $\SU(3)$. If we denote $\mu : M \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}^2$ the moment map associated to the action of $T$ on $M$, then the image of the moment map is a hexagon with vertices $A$, $B$, $C$, $D$, $E$, $F$ the images of the elements $M^T$ by $\mu $.

hexagon with vertices labelled A, B, C, D, E, F

For $P \subset \mathfrak{t}^*$ an affine space with vectorial direction $\overrightarrow{P}$, let $P^\perp \mathrel{:=} \lbrace \xi \in \mathfrak{t} \mathrel| \langle y, \xi \rangle =0, \forall y \in {(\overrightarrow{P})}^\perp\rbrace $, and let $T_P$ be the sub-torus generated by $\operatorname{Exp}(P^\perp)$.

If $\Sigma \mathrel{:=} \lbrace \text{$P$ convex polytope in $\mathfrak{t}^*$} \mathrel| \exists \text{$Z$ connected component of $M^{T_P}$ s.t $ \mu (Z)= P$}\rbrace$, how can I prove that $\Sigma = \lbrace\text{faces of $ \mu (M)$}\rbrace \cup\lbrace [AD],[BE], [FC]\rbrace$?

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ Related: mathoverflow.net/questions/376299/… , and possibly also mathoverflow.net/questions/152589/… . $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Nov 13, 2020 at 22:14
  • $\begingroup$ I think I don't understand the notation. You use $P$ for an affine space, and then write $T_p$, which presumably should be $T_P$; but then you refer to $T_p$ (which maybe equals $T_P$) for $P$ a polytope, which is not an affine space. Do you want to identify the polytope $P$ with its affine span? $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Nov 13, 2020 at 22:16
  • $\begingroup$ Oh sorry for that ! But , yes you're right, I'll fix that . $\endgroup$
    – Maria
    Commented Nov 13, 2020 at 22:19
  • $\begingroup$ I have been thinking about my answer, which originally purported to prove this but seems to prove something else. I can't see any way to get the diagonals of the hexagon in $\Sigma$. Could you point to a reference that claims that they are there? $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Nov 18, 2020 at 0:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @LSpice, I will confirm this claim, and edit my question if needed ! Thank you so much for your help and your time I'de really appreciate it ! $\endgroup$
    – Maria
    Commented Nov 18, 2020 at 22:42

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

$\DeclareMathOperator\Ad{Ad}\DeclareMathOperator\Cent{C}\DeclareMathOperator\Norm{N}\newcommand\fg{\mathfrak g}\newcommand\fl{\mathfrak l}\newcommand\ft{\mathfrak t}\newcommand\C{\mathbb C}\newcommand\R{\mathbb R}$Based on your previous question Question about an example in symplectic geometry and this one, it looks like you are working through some notes on symplectic geometry and moment maps. It might be a good idea to gather your questions and see if you can unify them into one big one, rather than asking several different but closely related ones.

Put $G = \operatorname{SU}(3)$. Let $\{\alpha, \beta\}$ be a system of simple roots of $T$ in $G$, and let $X^*$ be an element of $M$ that lies in the subset of $\fg^*$ that vanishes on all root spaces of $T$ in $\fg_\C$, which we identify with $\ft^*$.

For future reference, suppose that $g \in G$ is such that $\Ad^*(g)X^*$ is trivial on every root space in $\fg_\C$ other than the $\pm\alpha$-root spaces. Let $L$ be the subgroup of $G$ whose complexified Lie algebra is the sum of the Lie algebra of $T$ and the $\pm\alpha$-root spaces in $G_\C$ (so $L$ is, as it were, $\operatorname S(\operatorname U(2) \times \operatorname U(1))$). Then we may identify $\fl^*$ with the set of elements of $\fg^*$ trivial on every root space in $\fg_\C$ other than the $\pm\alpha$-root spaces. Clearly, $\Ad^*(L\cdot\Norm_G(T))X^*$ is contained in $\fl^*$. On the other hand, suppose that $g \in G$ is such that $\Ad^*(g)X^*$ lies in $\fl^*$. Then $T = \Cent_L(X^*)$ and $g T g^{-1} = \Cent_L(\Ad^*(g)X^*)$ are both maximal in $L$, hence are conjugate by an element of $L$; so $L g$ intersects $\Norm_G(T)$.

Let $T'$ be a subtorus of $T$. We have that the fixed points of $T'$ in $\fg^*$ are those $Y^* \in \fg^*$ that vanish on every root subspace in $\fg_\C$ associated to a root that is non-trivial on $T'$. In particular, this fixed-point space depends only on the collection of roots trivial on $T'$. If this set of roots is non-empty (equivalently, if $T' \ne T$) and does not contain all roots (equivalently, $T'$ is non-trivial), then it is a singleton, hence a Weyl conjugate of $\{\alpha\}$. Then we have shown that, up to Weyl conjugacy, $M^{T'}$ equals $\Ad^*(L\cdot\Norm_G(T))X^*$, whose components, indexed by $\Norm_L(T)\backslash\Norm_G(T)$, are $\Ad^*(L)X^*$, $\Ad^*(L s_\beta)X^*$, $\Ad^*(L s_\beta s_\alpha)X^*$. The corresponding $P$s are, respectively, the edge between $\mu(X^*)$ and $\mu(s_\alpha X^*)$; the edge between $\mu(X^*)$ and $\mu(s_\beta X^*)$; and the diagonal between $\mu(X^*)$ and $\mu(s_\beta s_\alpha X^*)$. In your labelling, these might be $[AB]$, $[AF]$, and $[AD]$. Taking Weyl conjugates gives the other faces and diagonals.

$\endgroup$
13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Wait a minute, I now think that the components are actually the edges between $\mu(X^*)$ and $\mu(s_\alpha X^*)$ ($[AB]$), between $\mu(s_\beta X^*)$ and $\mu(s_\alpha s_\beta X^*$ ($[EF]$), and between $\mu(s_\beta s_\alpha X^*)$ and $\mu(s_\alpha s_\beta s_\alpha X^*)$ ($[CD]$), and I don’t see how to get the diagonals. I will keep thinking. $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Nov 14, 2020 at 0:24
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much for your answer and for your time @LSpice ! I'll be looking for the rest of it ! But to be honest, my understanding of this was very little, since I'm a beginner in symplectic geometry! Could you please recommend some good references about properties of convex hulls of coadjoint orbits and their relation with weyl group (As your answer seems to be based on)? $\endgroup$
    – Maria
    Commented Nov 14, 2020 at 2:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Most of this is just stuff I've picked up in the course of learning the general structure theory of reductive groups, rather than coadjoint orbits and symplectic geometry specifically. Nonetheless, Kirillov is the master of the (coadjoint) orbit method; probably Kirillov - Lectures on the orbit method is a place to start. There's a paper by Kottwitz called "Harmonic analysis on reductive $p$-adic groups and Lie algebras" (MSN) that I seem to remember discusses these polytopes, too. $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Nov 14, 2020 at 3:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That's a good question. It's clear that each $\operatorname{Ad}^*(Ln)X^*$ with $n \in \operatorname N_G(T)$ is connected, and that it depends only on $\operatorname N_L(T)n$; but I don't see at the moment why two such connected sets can't intersect. I will think more about it. \\ In the meantime, did you clarify that the statement you were trying to prove was the correct one? $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Jan 21, 2021 at 19:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Maria, I have not had a chance to think through your latest comments. Is there a new question, or is it only more information / a different perspective? $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Jan 28, 2021 at 17:54

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .