5
$\begingroup$

In the classification of complex simple Lie algebras/groups, I have always been vaguely puzzled why $B_n$ and $C_n$ are labeled the way they are. I always instinctively want to put the special orthogonal groups together, and so I am tempted to use the letter $B$ for what is standardly called $C$, and vice versa. Looking at the Dynkin diagrams of affine Weyl groups reinforces this instinct of mine, because the vertex of degree 3 makes $\tilde D_n$ look more like $\tilde B_n$ than $\tilde C_n$, at least in my eyes.

Is there some intuitive reason for the standard notation? Or is just a historical accident with no particular rhyme or reason behind it?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $B$, $C$, and $D$ all rhyme, so sadly there is no appeal to rhyme to order them differently. :-) $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Jun 19, 2020 at 3:58

1 Answer 1

8
$\begingroup$

"Historical convention" (going back to Lie?) is probably the correct explanation, but note that under what I would call the "standard combinatorial folding procedure" as described by Stembridge in Folding by automorphisms, we produce the Type $B_n$ root system from the Type $A_{2n-1}$ root system, and the Type $C_{n}$ root system from the Type $D_{n+1}$ root system. Though note, as discussed in this prior MO question, that there are two "dual" folding procedures which both arise in Lie theory.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ In particular, when classifying simple Lie algebras it is nice to first construct all the simply laced Dynkin diagrams/root systems/Lie algebras; and then show that the non-simply laced ones can all be obtained from the simply laced ones via folding along diagram automorphisms. In this second step, B comes from A, and C comes from D. $\endgroup$ Jun 19, 2020 at 3:28
  • $\begingroup$ Interesting. Do we have any indication that whoever first introduced the labeling was influenced by this fact? $\endgroup$ Jun 19, 2020 at 13:35
  • $\begingroup$ @TimothyChow: some comments in this recent question mathoverflow.net/questions/363404/… suggest the names of the types of the classical groups might go back to Lie. I guess one would have to read his papers to see why these letters are chosen. $\endgroup$ Jun 19, 2020 at 13:49
  • $\begingroup$ In fact, various sources are suggesting to me that the names go back to the 1885 paper of Lie, "Allgemeine Untersuchungen uber Differentialgleichungen die eine continuirliche endliche Gruppe gestatten": link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01446421. $\endgroup$ Jun 19, 2020 at 13:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.