1
$\begingroup$

The proof of Lemma 5-1-5 in this 1987 paper by Kawamata, Matsuda and Matsuki (link on Projecteuclid) seems to say that a variety with terminal singularities is $\mathbb{Q}$-factorial ( I only need the case $ \Delta =0$ in which case, weak log terminal might be the same as just terminal.). Does anyone know how to prove this, or a place where this is proved?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ In dimension two all klt singularities are $\mathbb{Q}$-factorial. In dimension three there are singularities which are terminal and not $\mathbb{Q}$-factorial, for instance the cone over $\mathbb{P}^1\times\mathbb{P}^1$. The Lemma you cite only talks about fibrations, I don't know how it would imply such statement. In any case, if you have a klt singularity, you can make it $\mathbb{Q}$-factorial with a small morphism, this is called a small $\mathbb{Q}$-factorialization. $\endgroup$ – Joaquín Moraga Feb 5 at 21:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I believe the paper assumes at the very beginning of section 5-1 that $X$ is $\mathbb Q$-factorial? As @JoaquínMoraga says, this is not true otherwise. $\endgroup$ – Devlin Mallory Feb 6 at 3:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.