2
$\begingroup$

Recently I read a thesis p-adic Galois representations and elliptic curves. Using Tate's curve, the author proved the p-adic Galois representations atteched to the Tate module of an elliptic curve is de Rham by constructing a basis of $D_{dR}(V)$ explicitly in Page 53. So the dimension of $D_{dR}(V)$ implies the representation is de Rham.

Question: Is there a likewise uniformization of an abelian variety over p-adic fields to prove the representation attached to Tate module is de Rham by constructing a basis? And I think I can prove the Hodge-Tate weights are 0 and 1 with the help of a basis.

Thanks in advance!

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There is a famous paper by Colwman and Iovita where they prove that semistable reduction abelian varieties have Tate module semistable: arxiv.org/abs/math/9701229 $\endgroup$ – Xarles Jul 2 '19 at 7:02
  • $\begingroup$ @Xarles Thanks for the reference ! $\endgroup$ – Ang Jul 2 '19 at 7:06
3
$\begingroup$

About the general uniformization you asked for. There is a construction by Raynaud of a general uniformization in the case of an abelian variety with semistable reduction: there exists a semiabelian variety $E$ with good reduction, extension of a good reduction abelian variety $B$ and a good reduction torus $T$: $$ 0 \to T \to E \to B\to 0$$ (you can suppose $T$ is a split torus by extending a bit you field of definition), and analytic maps $$ 0\to M \to E \to A \to 0$$ where $M$ is a lattice inside $E$ (the map from $E$ to $A$ is not algebraic), which you can suppose $M\cong \mathbb{Z}^r$, where $r=\dim(T)$, extending the field (as above). The case of Tate elliptic curves correspond to the case $B=0$ and $M=\mathbb{Z}$. This is what it is used by Coleman and Iovita. They are called Raynaud extension.

In the non semistable case, you can descent to a "potentially good reduction semiabelian variety" and uniformization the one above by using the semistable reduction theorem by Grothendieck (i.e., that any abelian variety acquires semistable reduction after a finite extension of you local field).

You can see:

  • M. Raynaud, 1-motifs et monodromie géométrique, Exposé VII, Astérisque 223(1994) 295–319
  • Bosch and Lütkebohmert, Degenerating abelian varieties, Topology 30:653–698, 1991
  • Werner Lütkebohmert, Rigid Geometry of Curves and Their Jacobians, 2016, Chapter 6.
| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.