3
$\begingroup$

Let $k$ be a perfect field of characteristic $p>0$, $W=W(k)$ its ring of Witt vectors, $K_0=W(k)[\frac{1}{p}]$ and, $K/K_0$ be a totally ramified extension. Let $\pi \in K$ be an uniformizer.

Consider the Kummer/Breuil extension $K_{\infty}:=\bigcup_{n \geq 0} K_n$, where $K_n:=K(\pi_n)$ and define $G_{K_{\infty}}=\text{Gal}(\bar K/K_{\infty}) \subset G_K=\text{Gal}(\bar K/K)$, where $\bar K$ is the algebraic closure of $K$.

My question:

Denote by $\text{Rep}_{\mathbb{Q}_p}(G_{K_\infty})$ the category of continuous representations of $G_{K_\infty}$ on finite dimensional $\mathbb{Q}_p$-vector spaces or in other words, $\text{Rep}_{\mathbb{Q}_p}(G_{K_\infty})$ is the category of $p$-adic representations of $G_{K_\infty}$. Also denote by $\text{Rep}_{\mathbb{Z}_p}(G_{K_\infty})$ is the category of $\mathbb{Z}_p$-representations. Now $p$-adic Tate module $T_p(G)$ of $p$-divisible group $G$ is equipped with structure of $\mathbb{Z}_p$-module. \begin{align} &\text{(1) When $T_p(G) \in \text{Rep}_{\mathbb{Q}_p}(G_{K_\infty}) \ \text{or} \ \text{Rep}_{\mathbb{Z}_p}(G_{K_\infty})$ ?} \\ &\text{(2) What is the relation between the category $\text{Rep}_{\mathbb{Q}_p}(G_{K_\infty})$ and the category } \\ & \hspace{2cm} \text{ of $p$-adic Tate modules $T_p(G)$ of $p$-divisible groups $G$ ?} \\ & \text{(3) Is the functor $\text{Rep}_{\mathbb{Z}_p \ or \ \mathbb{Q}_p}(G_{K_{\infty}})$} \longrightarrow \{\text{category of} \ T_p(G) \} \ full \ or \ surjective ? \end{align}

I am trying to identify $T_p(G)$ in the category $\text{Rep}_{\mathbb{Q}_p}(G_{K_\infty})$ or in $\text{Rep}_{\mathbb{Z}_p}(G_{K_\infty})$.

Case I: When we consider $G$ is just the abelian group $\text{of roots of unity}$ in the separable closure $K^s$ of $K$, then the $p$-adic Tate module is the rank one free $\mathbb{Z}_p$-module equipped with action of the absolute Galois group $G_K$ of $K$. That is, in this case the $p$-adic Tate module is the Galois representation or $p$-adic cyclotomic character of $K$.

Case II: When $G$ is the abelian variety over the field $K$, the $K^s$-valued points of $G$ form an abelian group. The $p$-adic Tate module $T_p(G)$ of $G$ is the Galois representation of the absolute Galois group $G_K$ of $K$.

But,more generally, I am trying to identify $T_p(G)$ in the category $\text{Rep}_{\mathbb{Q}_p}(G_{K_\infty})$ or in $\text{Rep}_{\mathbb{Z}_p}(G_{K_\infty})$.

Any help would be appreciated.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

I think Kisin's article "Crystalline representations and $F$-crystals" may be helpful. If you haven't read this, the following is a quick mention of some results.

There are several ways to express $T_pG$ in the form of a $\mathbf{Z}_p[G_{K_{\infty}}]$-module. For example, using Breuil-Kisin modules (cf. Corollary 2.1.4; Lemma 2.2.4; Theorem 2.2.7).
In practice, it is difficult to express $T_pG$ in the form of a $\mathbf{Z}_p[G_K]$-module by Breuil-Kisin modules (notice that $\mathfrak{S}$ is only stable under $G_{K_{\infty}}$ not under $G_{K}$; the expression in Corollary 2.1.4 hence has no obvious $G_K$-action, but a $G_{K_{\infty}}$-action), that's something not so good about Breuil-Kisin module in my opinion.

We have the forgetful functor $\mathbf{Rep}_{\mathbf{Z}_p}(G_K)\to \mathbf{Rep}_{\mathbf{Z}_p}(G_{K_{\infty}})$, a good news is that this functor is fully faithful when we restrict on the subcategory of crystalline representations $\mathbf{Rep}_{\mathbf{Z}_p}^{cris}(G_K)$ (cf. Corollary 2.1.14).

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your nice input. I also settled the matter in the same direction as you mentioned. Also thanks for the last para of your answer, which I wasn't aware of. It is nice $\endgroup$ Apr 15 at 13:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.