Let $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ be a bounded domain with infinitely smooth boundary. Define the Sobolev norm on $C^\infty(\bar \Omega)$ $$||u||_{W^{1,2}}:=\sqrt{\int_\Omega (|\nabla u|^2+u^2)dx}.$$ Let us denote by $W_0^{1,2}$ the completion of the space of smooth compactly supported functions in $\Omega$ with respect to this norm.

Let $u\in W^{1,2}_0\cap C(\bar \Omega)$. Is it true that $u$ vanishes on $\partial \Omega$?

Apologies if this question is not of the research level.

  • $\begingroup$ Sure, the trace (restriction to boundary) map $r: C^\infty(\overline \Omega) \to C^\infty(\partial \Omega)$ is continuous when you equip the domain with the $W^{1,2}$ norm and the codomain with the $L^2$ norm, or when you equip both with the $C^0$ norm, and hence extends to a continuous map $(W^{1,2} \cap C^0)(\overline \Omega) \to (L^2 \cap C^0)(\partial \Omega)$. Because the map $r$ vanishes on the set of compactly supported smooth functions in $\Omega$, it also vanishes on its closure. The continuity in $C^0$ is obvious, while the continuity in $W^{1,2} \to L^2$ is in many PDE books. $\endgroup$ – Mike Miller Eismeier May 29 '19 at 0:06
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @MikeMiller: I'm not sure I follow your argument. The closure of the compactly supported smooth functions within the space $W^{1,2}(\Omega) \cap C^0(\overline{\Omega})$ might be smaller than $W^{1,2}_0(\Omega)$. $\endgroup$ – Jochen Glueck May 29 '19 at 5:28

For the sake of completeness, an expansion on the comment by Mike Miller:

In Evans/Gariepy, Thm. 4.3.1, it is proven that if the boundary of $\Omega$ is Lipschitz, then for $1 \leq p < \infty$ there is a continuous linear trace operator $T$ from $W^{1,p}(\Omega)$ to $L^p(\Omega;\mathcal{H}_{n-1})$ which satisfies $$Tf = f \quad \text{on $\partial \Omega$}$$ if $f \in W^{1,p}(\Omega) \cap C(\overline\Omega)$.

Observing that $W^{1,p}_0(\Omega)$ is a closed subspace of $W^{1,p}(\Omega)$ and taking $g \in W^{1,p}_0(\Omega)$ and a sequence $(g_k) \subset C_c^\infty(\Omega)$ such that $g_k \to g$ in the $W^{1,p}(\Omega)$ norm, we obtain $$Tg = \lim_k Tg_k = g_k = 0 \quad \text{in $L^p(\partial\Omega,\mathcal{H}_{n-1})$}.$$ Thus, if $g \in W^{1,p}_0(\Omega) \cap C(\overline\Omega)$, then $0 = Tg = g$ everywhere on $\partial\Omega$.

It is maybe worthwile to note (Thm. 5.3.2 in Evans/Gariepy) that $T$ is in fact given by $$Tf(x) := \lim_{r\searrow0}\frac1{|B_r(x) \cap \Omega|} \int_{B_r(x) \cap \Omega} f$$ which can be a useful thing to look at also in situations where $\partial\Omega$ is less regular.

Evans, Lawrence C.; Gariepy, Ronald F., Measure theory and fine properties of functions, Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Boca Raton: CRC Press. viii, 268 p. (1992). ZBL0804.28001.


The claim is true, and there are likely many different arguments. The one I like is as follows.

  1. Suppose that $u \in W^{1,2}(\Omega)$. Then there is $h \in W^{1,2}(\Omega)$ which is harmonic in $\Omega$ (in the sense that $\int \langle\nabla h, \nabla v\rangle = 0$ for every $v \in W^{1,2}_0(\Omega)$) and $h - u \in W^{1,2}_0(\Omega)$.

  2. If additionally $u \in C(\overline{\Omega})$, then $h$ is given as a Poisson integral of the boundary values of $u$. In particular, if $h = 0$ in $\Omega$, then $u = h = 0$ on $\partial \Omega$.

  3. However, if $u \in W^{1,2}_0(\Omega)$, then $h = u + (h - u) \in W^{1,2}_0(\Omega)$, and so $\int \langle \nabla h, \nabla h\rangle = 0$, that is, $h$ is identically zero.

It follows that if $u \in C(\overline{\Omega}) \cap W^{1,2}_0(\Omega)$, then $h = 0$ in $\Omega$ (by item 3) and consequently $u = h = 0$ on $\partial \Omega$ (by item 2).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.