3
$\begingroup$

Given a group $G$, a ring $R$ and two $R[G]$-modules $M,N$. Then one can consider $Hom_R(M,N)$ and define inductively submodules $A_0,A_1,...$ via

$A_0:=0$

$A_{n+1}:=\{ \;f\; |\; \forall\; g\in G: (x\mapsto f(gx)-gf(x))\in A_n\}$

$A_1$ is then precisely $Hom_{R[G]}(M,N)$. So I am wondering, what the modules $A_2,..$ might be good for. A guess is, that this should be related to group cohomology in some way (, which I don't see).

For example with $G=\mathbb{Z}$ with generator $t$ and $M:=\mathbb{Z}[G],N:=\mathbb{Z}$ (with trivial $G$ action) one gets: $A_n=\{f \in Hom_\mathbb{Z}(M,N) | $ There are $ a_0,...,a_n \in \mathbb{Z} : f(t^n) =\sum_{i=0}^n a_i n^i\}$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I'm guessing $R$ is meant to be be commutative? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 21, 2010 at 12:34
  • $\begingroup$ Im you want to. (Otherwise $A_n$ would just be an abelian subgroup of $Hom_R(M,N)$, but the rest should still make sense). $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 21, 2010 at 14:26
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe you add some more concrete questions? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 21, 2010 at 17:43

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

Let $\Lambda=R[G]$. Consider $L=Hom_R(M,N)$ as a $\Lambda$-module with the "conjugation" action: $(gf)(x)=gf(g^{-1}x)$. Let $I\subset \Lambda$ be the kernel of the augmentation $\Lambda\to R$, i.e. the ideal generated by $1-x$ for all $x\in G$. Then $A_n$ is the largest submodule of $L$ annihilated by $I^n$, or in other words $A_n=Hom_{\Lambda}(\Lambda/I^n,L)$.

I don't know what it's good for.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

As you have not asked a question, I don't have to give any answer :-))

The group is irrelevant, you can do all the same with a group algebra $A=RG$, and then forget about group algebra and talk about any $R$-algebra $A$. If both $A$ and $R$ are commutative, then you have reinvented differential operators from $M$ to $N$. Congratulations! Needless to say that they are useful.

If $A$ or $R$ are no longer commutative then it is some noncommutative version of differential operators, whose usefulness is greatly diminished...

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ You get differential operators if you consider (in the context of Tom's answer) $I$ to be the kernel of the augmentation $A\otimes_RA\to A$ given by multiplication. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 21, 2010 at 20:01
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, sure, as Tom has redefined the same thing. My point is that it happens to have a name "differential operator", which partially answers the usefullness non-question. $\endgroup$
    – Bugs Bunny
    Commented Jul 21, 2010 at 20:18

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .