2
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathcal{E} \rightarrow X$ be a complex vector bundle of rank $r+1$ and let $F=\mathbb{P}^r \rightarrow E = \mathbb{P}\mathcal{E}\rightarrow X$ be the associated projective bundle. We know that under the assumption that $H^{\bullet}(E) \rightarrow H^{\bullet}(F)$ is surjective, by the Leray-Serre spectral sequence we have for any field $k$ $$H^{\bullet}(E, k) \simeq H^{\bullet}(X,k) \otimes H^{\bullet}(F,k)$$ Where the tensor product on the right is graduated. Can we say anything more about the algebra structure of left hand side when we take $\mathbb{Z}$ coefficients, maybe in terms of the Chern classes of the bundle, unravelling the definitions of the Leray-Serre spectral sequence?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

As you say, if the map $H(E)\to H(F)$ is surjective, the Leray-Serre spectral sequence degenerates at the $E^2$-page which is therefore isomorphic to the $E^\infty$-page. Unwrapping the definitions, this means that there is a filtration on $H^*(E)$ such that the associated graded is $H^*(X)\otimes H^*(F)\cong H^*(X)[x]/x^{r+1}$. Choosing a representative of the class $x$, we obtain that $H^*(E)$ is generated as a $H^*(X)$-algebra (with $H^*(X)$ in filtration degree $0$) by a single element $x$ in degree and filtration degree $2$ such that $x^{r+1}$ sits in degree less than $2r+2$. This can only happen if there is a relationship of the form $x^{r+1} = \sum_{k=0}^r p^*\gamma_{r+1-k}x^k$ with $\gamma_k\in H^{2k}(X)$. Determining the concrete values of the $c_k$ amounts to solving the extension problem of the Leray-Serre spectral sequence, which is in a sense precisely the part of the problem the spectral sequence doesn't capture. However, in this case we can solve this problem geometrically: By construction, the pullback of $\mathcal E$ to $E$ splits off a line bundle $L$, and we may take $x = -c_1(L)$. Since $p^*\mathcal E/L$ is $r$-dimensional, its $(r+1)$-th Chern class vanishes, and the sum formula for the total Chern class yields $$ c(p^*\mathcal E/L) = c(p^*\mathcal E)(1-x)^{-1}. $$ Expanding the second factor as $\sum_{k=0}^r x^k$ and taking the resulting expression for the $(r+1)$-th Chern class yields $\gamma_k = c_k(\mathcal E)$. In fact, this can be used to define Chern classes for general complex oriented cohomology theories.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ When you say: "The pullback splits off a line bundle" you mean you take $L$ to be line subbundle of $p^{\ast}\mathcal{E}$ generated by the tautological section? $\endgroup$ Feb 18, 2019 at 16:25
  • $\begingroup$ More or less - a point in $E$ is a point $x\in X$, together with a one-dimensional subspace $V$ of $\mathcal E_x$. The fiber of $L$ over $(x,V)$ is precisely the one-dimensional subspace $V$ of $(p^*\mathcal E)_{(x,V)}\cong \mathcal E_x$. Note that $L$ is not generated by a non-vanishing section (otherwise it would be trivial, but by definition its restriction to every fiber is nontrivial), and there is no canonical section of $p^*\mathcal E$. $\endgroup$ Feb 18, 2019 at 20:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.