Let $A \subset X$ and $B \subset Y$ be topological spaces, with $A$ and $B$ closed, and $f: X \to Y$ be a continuous functions such that $f(A) \subset B$.

The Leray spectral sequence (with complex coefficients) associated with $f$ has $E_2$-term $$E_2^{pq} = H^p(Y,\mathcal{J}^q),$$ where $\mathcal{J}^q$ is the sheafification of the presheaf $$U \to H^q(f^{-1}(U), \mathbb{C}), \quad \forall U \subset Y \text{ open},$$ and converges to $H^*(X,\mathbb{C})$.

In a similar manner, one can construct the Leray spectral sequence associated with $f: (X,A) \to (Y,B)$, seen as a continuous function between pairs. My guess is that it should have $E_2$-term $$E_2^{pq} = H^p(Y,B ; \mathcal{J}^q),$$ where we are now considering local cohomology.

My problem is that I'm not sure to see what the sheaf $\mathcal{J}^q$ looks like in this case. A natural guess would be that it associates to any open set $U \subset Y$ the relative cohomology group $H^q(f^{-1}(U), f^{-1}(U \cap B) ; \mathbb{C})$. In such case, we would have $$\mathcal{J}^q(U) = 0$$ for any open set $U \subset X$ such that $U \subset B$. In particular, the stalk above any point of $B$ would be $0$, which seems very strange.

Could someone help ?

Thanks a lot !


1 Answer 1


Let me first consider the easier case of the Serre spectral sequence. So we assume $f:X \to Y$ is a fibration with fiber $F$, and that $f^{-1}(B)=A$. Then there is a "relative" Serre spectral sequence $$ E_2^{pq} = H^p(Y,B;H^q(F,\mathbf Z)) \implies H^{p+q}(X,A;\mathbf Z).$$ The proof of this can be found in many places (I'm quite sure it's in Spanier for example). It can be proven by a modification of the standard cellular proof of the Serre spectral sequence.

Now suppose you want to work in a sheaf-theoretic world instead, to get the genuine Leray spectral sequence. If you've been fully "six-functor"-ified then relative cohomology is somehow not so natural: rather than considering the relative cohomology groups $H^\ast(X,A;F)$ one can instead consider $H^\ast(X,j_!j^\ast F)$ where $j \colon (X\setminus A) \to X$ is the open inclusion. So to get Leray spectral sequence converging to the relative groups $H(X,A;F)$ just apply the usual Leray spectral sequence to the sheaf $j_!j^\ast F$ instead.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot @Dan. If I understand you well, the $E_2$-page of the Leray spectral sequence would, in the case, be: $$E_2^{pq} = H^p(Y, R^q f_* (j_{!} j^* F)),$$ where $f : X \to Y$ is our continuous map sending $A$ to $B$. How is it that $B$ doesn't appear anywhere here ? Thanks a lot. $\endgroup$
    – BrianT
    Jun 25, 2018 at 9:07
  • $\begingroup$ Well, the spectral sequence you get doesn't depend on B. It depends on X, Y and A though. Let me remark that there can't be a sequence exactly like the one you wrote, where you can take for B any closed subset containing the image of A. For then you could take B=Y and you'd get the E2-page identically zero, but converging to something nontrivial... $\endgroup$ Jun 25, 2018 at 17:11
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your help @Dan, things are much clearer now. $\endgroup$
    – BrianT
    Jun 25, 2018 at 17:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.