Suppose $A$ and $B$ are two bounded linear operators on $\ell^2(\mathbb{N})$ such that with respect to the standard orthonormal basis, the matrices $A=(a_{mn})_{m,n}$ and $B=(b_{mn})_{m,n}$ consist of non-negative entries. It is not difficult to show that for any $\lambda\in [0,1]$, the matrix $(a_{mn}^{\lambda}b_{mn}^{1-\lambda})_{m,n}$ gives rise to a bounded operator $C_{\lambda}$ on $\ell^2(\mathbb{N})$ and $$\|C_{\lambda}\| \leq \|A\|^{\lambda}\cdot\|B\|^{1-\lambda},$$ where $\|\cdot\|$ denotes the operator norm.

Such an estimate seems to be closely related with interpolation of operators. However the usual interpolation theorems that I know are for ''the same'' operator acting on different spaces. Is there a version of interpolations that could directly prove the above statement (and perhaps in a more general setting)?

Another related question: which functions $\varphi(x,y)$ on two variables that give rise to the norm inequality $$\Big\|\Big(\varphi(a_{mn}, b_{mn})\Big)_{m,n}\Big\| \leq \varphi(\|A\|,\|B\|),$$ where $A=(a_{mn})$ and $B=(b_{mn})$ are two bounded operators on $\ell^2(\mathbb{N})$ whose entries are non-negative? We see above that $\varphi(x,y)=x^{\lambda}y^{1-\lambda}$ for $0\leq\lambda\leq 1$ works. In addition, $\varphi(x,y)=x^{s}y^{t}$ for non-negative integers $s,t$ also works and this follows from properties of Hadamard product.


In this setting, this is just the maximum principle (or Hadamard's three-line lemma) in complex analysis. Namely you can define the operator $C_\lambda$ for every complex number $\lambda$ with real part in $[0,1]$. This operator depends holomorphically on $\lambda$. When $\lambda$ has real part $0$, the inequality $\|C_\lambda\| \leq \|C_0\|=\|B\|$ is clear, and so is the inequality $\|C_\lambda\| \leq \|C_1\|=\|A\|$ when $\lambda$ has real part $1$. So by the three line lemma, we obtain $\|C_\lambda\| \leq \|A\|^{Re \lambda} \|B\|^{1-Re \lambda}$.

This is indeed a very particular case of a general interpolation theorem, namely Stein's interpolation method.

  • $\begingroup$ Yes, the proof you gave is what I have (in addition to a direct computational proof). Thank for the reference on Stein's interpolation method. Do you have any insights on what $\varphi$ works? The case $\varphi(x,y)=x^sy^t$ (where $s,t$ are non-negative integers) doesn't seem to follow from Stein's interpolation, does it? $\endgroup$ – T. Le Feb 7 '18 at 12:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I don't know what other $\varphi$ work, but the case $\varphi(x,y)=x^s y^t$ (for $s,t$ non-negative real numbers) follows from Stein interpolation. If $(s,t)$ can be written as $(n\theta,m(1-\theta))$ for $n,m$ integers ans $\theta \in (0,1)$ (for example if $s,t$ are integers, $\theta= \frac 1 2$ and $n=2s,m=2t$), consider the map $z \mapsto A^{nz} B^{m(1-z)}$. $\endgroup$ – Mikael de la Salle Feb 7 '18 at 12:17
  • $\begingroup$ Interesting point! I believe in the map $z\mapsto A^{nz}B^{m(1-z)}$, you meant entrywise power and multiplication (which is what I'm interested in). But I think you still need Hadamard product to conclude that $\|A^{\circ n}\|\leq \|A\|^{n}$ (I put the circle in the power to indicate that the power is entry wise). $\endgroup$ – T. Le Feb 7 '18 at 12:51
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, you are correct, I was clumsy in my notation. $\endgroup$ – Mikael de la Salle Feb 7 '18 at 14:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.