14
$\begingroup$

I have plotted solutions $(a,b,c)$ to $a^2 + b^2 + c^2 = n$ for $12000 \leq n < 12100$, rescaled to $S^2$ and projected onto the first two coordinates. (these are read from the lower left, across and upwards. Sorry.)

enter image description here

While, over all $ a \leq n \leq b$ there is clear tendency towards equidistribution, for a fixed $n$, there are marked patterns (or even no solution at all). I've been struggling to find language for the types of patterns that are observing. There are solution-free regions, there are linear patterns, circular patterns and other sub-varieties.

I suspect for fixed $n$, the solutions are clustering along the intersection of two vareties, $S^2 \cap V $ and I am trying to characterize the equations of $V$.

This is my theory of why equidistribution might be so hard to prove; it's because there are in fact patterns.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ You might see Jim Cogdell's discussion of the three-squares problem... easily google-able. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 13, 2017 at 0:14

3 Answers 3

15
$\begingroup$

There is no clustering of the solutions of $a^2+b^2+c^2=n$, even for individual $n$'s, assuming the number of solutions is large (e.g. when $n\equiv 1,2,3,5,6\pmod{8}$ and $n$ is large). This was proved by William Duke (Invent. Math. 92 (1988), 73-90), his paper is available (for free) here.

For more recent results, e.g. what happens beyond equidistribution, see the work of Bourgain-Sarnak-Rudnick here and here.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ I agree with you that any patterns, if they exist, eventually go away. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 12, 2017 at 23:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @johnmangual: Yes. I should add that Duke's theorem is rather deep, it is one of the celebrated results of analytic number theory. $\endgroup$
    – GH from MO
    Commented Oct 12, 2017 at 23:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You might add Duke and Schulze-Pillot (1990) for other positive ternary forms, I put a copy at zakuski.math.utsa.edu/~kap/Duke_Schulze_Pillot_1990.pdf There is a simplified version in the corollary to Theorem 3 $\endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Commented Oct 13, 2017 at 0:01
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Note that equidistribution does not rule out "lower-order" patterns, e.g. enhancement near subvarieties, as long as these enhancements don't rise to the level of putting positive mass on these lower-dimensional subsets. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 13, 2017 at 0:45
  • $\begingroup$ @LiorSilberman: I agree. I would be interested in any results in that ddirection. $\endgroup$
    – GH from MO
    Commented Oct 13, 2017 at 16:54
13
$\begingroup$

There is a $48$-element symmetry group of the space of solutions. This by itself will create the appearance of the patterns when the number of solutions divided by $48$ is small. Imagine choosing $k$ random points in the fundamental domain $a \geq b \geq c \geq 0$ and reflecting them around the sphere. Patterns will appear, simply because it is unlikely for the $k$ points to be uniform in the triangle, and any nonuniformities will be magnified by some or all of the symmetries.

In your case $k \approx 2 \pi (12000)^{1/2} / 48 \approx 14$ is pretty small, and this might partially or entirely explain all the effect you see.

$\endgroup$
3
1
$\begingroup$

Here I plotted some solutions around $n= 120,000 \pm 50$ and hoping a parallel algorithm could accelerate the process for $n \approx 1.2 \times 10^6$. Here we notice again, distinctive, but fainter patterns.

enter image description here

At around $n \asymp 10^6$ these solution sets look pretty homogeneous. I'm a little bit nervious about floating point artifacts or other programming issues. The solution sets look like random spherical harmonics. This might even have a name in the physics literature.

enter image description here

There might be approximate algorithms for $n \asymp 10^8$ .

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .