Let $G$ be a compact, connected Lie group and $S$ a torus in $G$ not assumed maximal. Then conjugation in $G$ induces a faithful representation of $N = N_G(S)/Z_G(S)$ in the Lie algebra $\mathfrak s$ of $S$.

In all the instances I know where the image of $N \to \mathrm{GL}(\mathfrak s)$ is a reflection group, it is because there is a closed, connected subgroup $K$ of $G$ such that $S$ is its maximal torus, and $N$ is isomorphic to the Weyl group of $K$.

For instance, it happens

  1. If $S$ is a maximal torus,

  2. If $S$ is a circle (edit: this memory of mine is untrue; I had shown this only in a few cases, so the answer is negative),

  3. If $S$ is the maximal torus in some $K$ such that $H^*(G;\mathbb Q) \to H^*(K;\mathbb Q)$ is surjective,

  4. If $S$ is the maximal torus in the fixed-point set of some finite-order Lie group automorphism of $G$.

Does it always happen? If $N$ is a reflection group, is it always a $W_K$?

A less concise version of this question has already appeared on MSE.


1 Answer 1


The answer is negative, even if $S$ is a circle, i.e., $1$-dimensional. To see that let $G$ be simple such that its Weyl group contains $-1$, i.e., $G$ is not of type $A_n$, $D_{2n+1}$, or $E_6$. Then $N_G(S)/Z_G(S)=\{\pm1\}$ is a reflection group for any $1$-dimensional subgroup. $S\subseteq T$. There are infinitely many conjugacy classes of $S$. But $G$ contains only finitely many conjugacy classes of semisimple rank-$1$-subgroups.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I don't understand the answer to what is negative. When $S$ has dimension 1, to say that the image is a reflection group is either an empty statement (if one says that the trivial group is a reflection group) or means that $N_G(S)/Z_G(S)$ has order 2 (or equivalently $N_G(S)\neq Z_G(S)$. You seem to say that the latter holds. So, well, I'm just confused. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Sep 24, 2016 at 7:18
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Now I am confused. In these particular examples, $N=N_G(S)/Z_G(S)$ is a reflection group of order $2$. The question was whether $N$ is then the Weyl group of an intermediate subgroup $K$ having $S$ as maximal torus. Any candidate for $K$ is either isomorphic to $SU(2)$ or $SO(3)$. There are only finiteley many conjugacy classes of those. So $K$ does not exist for most $S$. But maybe I got the question all wrong. $\endgroup$ Sep 24, 2016 at 8:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm sorry, I did all the confusion reading the question. The question is not whether the image of the representation of $N/Z$ is a reflection group, but takes it as an an assumption. (I hope I understand correctly "reflection group" as "generated by reflections", including, for instance, the trivial group.) $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Sep 24, 2016 at 10:33
  • $\begingroup$ "Reflection group" was intended to include the trivial group! $\endgroup$
    – jdc
    Sep 24, 2016 at 19:33
  • $\begingroup$ OK, this is actually what I'd hoped for (but not the error or confusion). I think I had proved in the $A_n$ and $D_{2n+1}$ cases that there exists a rank one simple containing subgroup, back when I asked this question on MSE, and misremembered that as having shown it in general. Is it obvious there are only finitely many conjugacy classes of simple subgroups? $\endgroup$
    – jdc
    Sep 24, 2016 at 19:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.