5
$\begingroup$

A torsionless abelian group $A$ is one for which any element $a\neq 0$ can be sent to a nonzero element of $Z$ by some homomorphism $A\rightarrow Z$ (integers). Equivalently, $A$ can be embedded as a subgroup of a Cartesian power of $Z$, $Z^I$.

A separable abelian group $A$ is one for which any element $a$ such that $\langle a \rangle$ is pure can be sent to $1\in Z$ by some homomorphism. Equivalently $A$ can be embedded as a pure subgroup of $Z^I$, equivalently any finitely generated pure subgroup is a direct summand.

There are torsionless abelian groups which are not separable, for example, take $A = Z^{(\omega)} + 2Z^\omega$. The element $\sum 2e_n$ generates a pure subgroup but any homomorphism to $Z$ must take it to a mulitple of $2$, since any such homomorphism has finite support in $\omega$, by a theorem of Specker.

I don't know of many other examples however, which leads to my problem:

Suppose $B$ is a countable subgroup of separable group $A$ so that $A/B$ is torsionless. Must $A/B$ be also separable?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The group $\mathbf{Q}$ is separable with the given definition. Probably it is assumed that a separable group is by definition torsionless. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented May 29, 2017 at 19:57

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

The answer is no.

Consider your (renamed) example $V = \mathbf{Z}^{(\omega)} + 2\mathbf{Z}^\omega$. It is quotient of the direct sum $$A=\mathbf{Z}^{(\omega)} \oplus 2\mathbf{Z}^\omega\simeq \mathbf{Z}^{(\omega)} \oplus \mathbf{Z}^\omega$$ by a subgroup $B$ isomorphic to the intersection, namely the countable subgroup $2\mathbf{Z}^{(\omega)}$. As you say, $V\simeq A/B$ is torsionless and not separable, while $A$ is separable.

$\endgroup$
-1
$\begingroup$

All of these groups are torsion-free of integer type. A is separable in the sense of Fuchs, "Abelian Groups", Springer 2015, pp 501-508. B is free. A/B is quasi-separable in the sense of 39 Pacific J Math No. 3 (1971), pp 603-612. Is it possible that the question posed is undecidable in the sense of the Whitehead Problem, Fuchs, pp 519-524?

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .