I know how to estimate the integral* (see the update) \begin{gather} \int f(Ub)d\mu(U), \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ [2] \end{gather} where $f:S^{n-1}(\mathbb{R})\to \mathbb{R}$ and $f(x)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}\frac{1}{x_i^2}$ and $d\mu$ is the Haar measure over orthogonal group $O(n)$. My trouble is the following:

Suppose we multiply $b$ with a matrix of complex values (in my case DFT matrix) $M$, i.e. $$\int g(UMb)d\mu(U),$$ where $g:S^{n-1}(\mathbb{C})\to \mathbb{R}$ and $g(x)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}\frac{1}{|x_i|^2}$ where $|.|$ is the absolute value. It is intuitively obvious for me that this integral should be equal to [2], specially considering that if $M$ was orthogonal this would have been true (due to properties of Haar measure), yet here $M$ is unitary.

Since my calculus knowledge is not that amazing --as you see-- I would appreciate some guidance to prove this. I imagine the title is not the best but that is what I could came up with.

UPDATE: This integral (as mentioned by @CarloBeenakker) is infinity (and I was aware of that). The integral I was referring (and mistakenly didn't mention) to, and have estimation of it is $\int h(Ub)\mu(U)$ where $h(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{m} \frac{1}{x_i^2 + \epsilon}$ for some positive $\epsilon$.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ have you checked for a simple case, say $n=2$, whether the two integrals indeed coincide? a priori I see no reason they should... $\endgroup$ – Carlo Beenakker Nov 19 '15 at 11:03
  • $\begingroup$ @JeanDuchon, thank you for the corrections. Yes you are right! $\endgroup$ – Cupitor Nov 19 '15 at 17:11

the two integrals are not the same, here is a simple example for $n=2$:

$$U=\begin{pmatrix} \cos\alpha & -\sin\alpha\\ \sin\alpha & \cos\alpha \end{pmatrix},\;\;d\mu(U)=d\alpha$$

$$M=\frac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix} i+\sqrt 2 & 1\\ -1 & -i+\sqrt 2 \end{pmatrix},\;\;b={1\choose 2}$$

$$\int g(UMb)d\mu(U)=5.80664$$

$$\int f(Ub)d\mu(U)=\infty$$

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the example. Can you please elaborate on this a bit. Do you have any intuition that why this is the case? And also how did you calculate the first integral? $\endgroup$ – Cupitor Nov 19 '15 at 16:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ well, the first integral is just some definite integral over $\alpha$ which I evaluated numerically; its value does not matter, what matters is that it is a finite number, while the second integral diverges; and for intuition: it is the other way around, my intuition tells me the two integrals should be different because the invariant measure is only invariant under orthogonal transformations, not under arbitrary unitary transformations; so I would not have expected any identity of the two integrals to begin with. $\endgroup$ – Carlo Beenakker Nov 19 '15 at 17:05
  • $\begingroup$ Very reasonable. Thank you. In my original problem I indeed have a $\epsilon$ in the denominator, but as far as I can see that doesn't matter! $\endgroup$ – Cupitor Nov 19 '15 at 17:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.