3
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathcal{H}$ and $\mathcal{K}$ be infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Let $B_1, \ldots, B_k \in B(\mathcal{H}).$ Define $L: B(\mathcal{K})^k \rightarrow B(\mathcal{H}\otimes \mathcal{K})$ via the formula $$L(X_1,\ldots, X_k) = \sum B_i \otimes X_i.$$

For each $\varepsilon > 0,$ does there exist a finite rank projection $P \in B(\mathcal{H})$ such that $$\|L(X_1,\ldots, X_k )\| \leq (1+\varepsilon)\|(P \otimes I)L(X_1,\ldots, X_k )(P \otimes I)\|$$ for all $(X_1,\ldots, X_k ) \in B(\mathcal{K})^k?$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What happens if you take $P$ to be projection onto the span of $\{x_1, \dots, x_k\}$, where $B_i$ almost attains its norm on $x_i$? $\endgroup$ – Nate Eldredge Apr 27 '15 at 6:07
5
$\begingroup$

No, there does not always exist such a finite rank projection.

Indeed, this implies that the linear space spanned by $B_1,\dots,B_k$ is exact as an operator space, and there are non-exact operator spaces. Actually one can check that the converse holds: if $B_1,\dots,B_n$ span an exact operator space, then such a $P$ exists (Edit: see the end of this answer for a proof). For a reference, I suggest Pisier's book operators spaces, or the original paper http://arxiv.org/abs/math/9308204.

To make this answer a bit more self-contained, recall that

  • An operator space is (by definition) a subspace of $B(H)$ for a Hilbert space $H$.
  • The completely bounded (cb) norm of a linear map $u \colon E \to F$ between two operator spaces is $\|u\|_{cb}$, the supremum over all $n$, all $x_1,\dots,x_k \in E$, all Hilbert spaces $K$ and all $a_1,\dots,a_n \in B(K)$ of $\frac{ \|\sum_i a_i \otimes u(x_i)\|}{ \|\sum_i a_i \otimes x_i\|}$.
  • The cb-distance between $E$ and $F$ is $d_{cb}(E,F)$, the infimum over all linear bijections $u \colon E \to F$ of $\|u\|_{cb} \|u^{-1}\|_{cb}$.
  • The exactness constant of a (finite dimensional) operator space $E$, denoted $ex(E)$, is the infimum, over all subspaces $F$ of a matrix algebra, of $d_{cb}(E,F)$.

With this terminology, it is immediate that a family $B_1,\dots,B_k$ for which your question has a positive answer satisfies that $ex(span(B_1,...,B_k))=1$. Indeed, your inequality is exactly that the map $u \colon B_i \mapsto P B_i P$ satisfies $\|u^{-1}\|_{cb} \leq 1+\varepsilon$, whereas the inequality $\|u\|_{cb} \leq 1$ is always true.

To completely answer your question, it remains to give examples of finite dimensional operator spaces with $ex(E)>1$.

The simplest one is probably the one that is denoted by $\max(\ell^1_k)$. It is the dual of $\ell^\infty_k$ in the category of operator spaces. Explicitely, it is linearly spanned by $B_1,\dots,B_k \in B(H)$ and satisfies that $$ \| \sum X_k \otimes B_k\| = \sup_{U_1,\dots,U_k \in B(\ell^2), \|U_i\| \leq 1} \|\sum X_k \otimes U_k\|.$$ However, the existence of a family $B_1,\dots,B_k$ satisfying this equality is not obvious. There are only nonexplicit constructions based on the Hahn-Banach theorem. Look at Ruan's theorem in Pisier's book.

Another example is obtained using groups. Consider $G$ a group generated by a finite set $g_1,\dots,g_k$, and take $B_i=\lambda(g_i) \in B(\ell^2(G))$, the operator by left-translation by $g_i$. Assume furthermore that the $g_1$ is equal to the identity of $G$. Then $ex(span(B_1,\dots,B_k))=1$ if and only if the group $G$ is exact. And there are groups constructed by Gromov that are not exact, as proved by Ozawa in http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0002185.


As requested in the comments, let me show that such a $P$ exists if $B_1,\dots,B_n$ span an operator space $E$ with exactness constant $ex(E)=1$.

The tool is a lemma by Roger Smith (see Proposition 1.12 in Pisier's book) asserting that for a map $u$ from an operator space to $M_n(\mathbf C)$ the cb-norm of $u$ is equal to the supremum (denoted $\|u\|_n$ in general) of $\frac{ \|\sum_i a_i \otimes u(x_i)\|}{ \|\sum_i a_i \otimes x_i\|}$ over all $k$, all $x_1,\dots,x_k \in E$ and all $a_1,\dots,a_k \in M_n(\mathbf C)$.

First, it is easy to see that for every finite subset $F$ of $B(K)^k$ and each $\varepsilon>0$, there exists a finite dimensional projection $P$ such that $$ \| L(X_1,\dots,X_k)\| \leq (1+\varepsilon) \| (P \otimes 1)L(X_1,\dots,X_k) (P \otimes 1)\| .$$

By the compactness of the unit ball of $M_n(\mathbf C)$, for every integer $n$ there exists a projection $P$ such that the preceding holds for all $X_1,\dots,X_n \in M_n(\mathbf C)$.

The problem is to have such a $P$ which does not depend on $n$, and this is where exactness is used: since $ex(E)=1$, there exists $n$, a subspace $F \subset M_n(\mathbf C)$ and a map $u \colon E \to F$ such that $\|u\|_{cb} \|u^{-1}\|_{cb} \leq 1+\varepsilon$. Let $P$ be projection as above for this value of $n$. If $u_P$ is the map sending $B_i$ to $P B_i P$, then I claim that $\|u_P^{-1}\|_{cb} \leq (1+\varepsilon)^2$, QED. Indeed: $$ \|u_P^{-1}\|_{cb} \leq \|u^{-1}\|_{cb} \|u \circ u_P^{-1}\|_{cb} = \|u^{-1}\|_{cb} \|u \circ u_P^{-1}\|_{n} \leq \|u^{-1}\|_{cb} \|u\|_n \|u_P^{-1}\|_{n} \leq (1+\varepsilon)^2.$$ The equality is Smith's lemma, and the last inequality comes from the choice of $P$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ In the exact case, how do you get the projections? $\endgroup$ – J. E. Pascoe Apr 27 '15 at 18:06
  • $\begingroup$ I added the proof at the bottom of my answer. $\endgroup$ – Mikael de la Salle Apr 27 '15 at 19:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.