5
$\begingroup$

Is there a finitely generated non-elementary word hyperbolic group the profinite completion of which is known (or conjectured) to be rather restricted, that is: abelian, pro-$p$, virtually prosolvable, etc. ?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

12
$\begingroup$

It's a famous open question whether every word-hyperbolic group is residually finite. Kapovich--Wise showed that this is equivalent to asking whether every non-trivial word-hyperbolic group has non-trivial profinite completion. In the other direction, Agol--Groves--Manning showed that it's equivalent to asking whether every quasiconvex subgroup of every word-hyperbolic group is separable.

In particular, since non-elementary word-hyperbolic groups always contain quasiconvex non-abelian free subgroups, if an example were known with virtually prosolvable profinite completion, the above questions would all be answered in the negative.

The best conjectural candidates for non-elementary word-hyperbolic groups with restricted profinite completion (in some sense) are cocompact lattices in $Sp(n,1)$ (aka quaternionic hyperbolic lattices). It's unknown whether these have the congruence subgroup property, and if they do, then I believe it again follows that all the above questions are answered in the negative.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ In light of this, it seems plausible that, in a certain statistical sense (random group model), subgroup separability will be a property of almost all finitely presented groups (since these are almost always hyperbolic). I suspect that this is the case for Gromov's model with low density (say d < 1/5). I have already asked this in mathoverflow.net/questions/191965/… . Do you know of someone who can help with this? $\endgroup$
    – Pablo
    Commented Jan 4, 2015 at 9:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Pablo, I answered your question. It's still very unclear what happens to random groups at higher densities, which can't possibly be virtually special. $\endgroup$
    – HJRW
    Commented Jan 4, 2015 at 11:54

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .