4
$\begingroup$

Let $H$ be a simply-connected, complete space of constant negative curvature, that is, a hyperbolic space, $\Gamma$ a discrete group of isometries, and and $M=H/\Gamma$ its quotient space; we assume that $M$ has finite volume.

It is known, I think, that $M$ is "of finite geometric type", that is, there exists a fundamental domain $D\subset H$ which is a finite hyperbolic polyhedron.

There is a universal way of building such polyhedra: we take a point $x\in H$, and consider its $\Gamma$-orbit $\Gamma\cdot x$. Define the Dirichlet-Voronoi polyhedron $P$ of $\Gamma\cdot x$ as the set of all $y\in H$ such that the distance from $y$ to $x$ is less than the distance to any other point of $\Gamma\cdot x$.

It is clear that $P$ is a fundamental domain.

Is it true that $P$ is a finite polyhedron for all $x\in H$? I think I can find this statement in the literature for dimension 3. Somebody told me this can be false in dimension more than 3.

A proof (or disproof) of this statement or a reference to it would be highly appreciated.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Note that the Dirichlet-Voronoi polyhedron you describe (more commonly called the Dirichlet domain) is only a fundamental domain when $\mathrm{Stab}_{\Gamma}(x)=\{1\}$. This is not guaranteed for an arbitrary discrete group of isometries $\Gamma$ of $H$. If $M$ is a manifold though, as suggested by your title, $\Gamma$ will be torsion-free in which case the condition is guaranteed. $\endgroup$ – j0equ1nn Sep 14 '15 at 22:49
8
$\begingroup$

B.Bowditch, Geometrical finiteness for hyperbolic groups. J. Funct. Anal. 113 (1993), no. 2, 245–317. The statement that you need is a corollary of his Proposition 5.6 in conjunction with finiteness of the holonomy group of a compact flat manifold (one of the Bieberbach's theorems). The statement which is false for $H^n$, $n\ge 4$, is "geometric finiteness implies that every Dirichlet domain is finitely-sided". (It is a nice example to work out, starting with an infinite cyclic groups of skew motions in $R^3$; this observation is originally due to Margulis.)

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.