11
$\begingroup$

Is there an infinite group $G$ such that there is not any sequence $(A_n)$ of its subsets such that always $$A_n=A_n^{-1}, \quad A_{n+1}A_{n+1}\subsetneqq A_n$$ ?

link

$\endgroup$
8
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Such a group has to be torsion. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 5, 2014 at 22:59
  • $\begingroup$ It's equivalent to say that $A_{n + 1} \subsetneq A_n, A_{n + 1} A_{n +1} \subseteq A_n$, by going through $A_{2n}$. $\endgroup$
    – user44191
    Commented Jul 5, 2014 at 23:49
  • $\begingroup$ I am not sure of the equivalence. I think closure under inverse is important (consider riffs on N under min). $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 6, 2014 at 0:34
  • $\begingroup$ Clearly all $A_n$ contain $1$ and $\bigcap _{n}A_n$ is a subgroup. $\endgroup$
    – H. Khas
    Commented Jul 6, 2014 at 0:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Misha I'm not sure of any link with approximate groups, which involve a parameter and finite subsets. On the other hand there should be a link with non-topologizable groups. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Jul 6, 2014 at 8:25

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

Here an extended comment. Call Property (P) the assumption of non-existence of such a sequence, so that the question is whether there exists an infinite group with (P)

My comment is the observation that if such a group exists, then it can be chosen to be finitely generated with all its proper subgroups finite ("quasi-finite").

Indeed, a group with Property (P) satisfies the following 2 properties:

  • it admits no nondiscrete Hausdorff topology "non-topologizable"
  • it's artinian (or min): it admits no properly descending chain of subgroups

Moreover Property (P) passes to subgroups.

Now I claim that if $G$ satisfies (P), then it contains an infinite quasi-finite subgroup: indeed if $G=G_0$ is not quasi-finite, then it admits a proper infinite subgroup $G_1$, and by induction we define a properly descending chain of subgroups, which has to stop, i.e. we eventually get a quasi-finite subgroup (hence with (P)).

Now a quasi-finite group is either finitely generated, or is an abelian Prüfer group $\mathbf{Z}[1/p]/\mathbf{Z}$ (Hall-Kulatilaka), but the latter is topologizable as we see by embedding it densely in the Lie group $\mathbf{R}/\mathbf{Z}$. Hence the resulting quasi-finite groups with (P) have to be finitely generated.

To conclude, the question boils down to whether there exists an infinite, quasi-finite, finitely generated group with (P).

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ I think it admits no nondiscrete Hausdorff topology is equivalent to it admits no nondiscrete metric. It seems such a group cannot have an infinite chain of (normal) subgroups. It suggests to me (somehow) that Hausdorffness may have a better substitution. Btw, I hope I can find a relation to Banach measure. $\endgroup$
    – H. Khas
    Commented Jul 6, 2014 at 21:28
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure what you mean by "no nondiscrete metric". What do you require about the metric? $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Jul 6, 2014 at 21:33
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure but if there is a sequence of neighborhoods of $1$ which make a base around $1$ in a group topology the topology must be pseudometrizible. If Hausdorff, then metrizable. $\endgroup$
    – H. Khas
    Commented Jul 6, 2014 at 21:37
  • $\begingroup$ OK, but once we are reduced to finitely generated quasi-finite groups, this discussion is of little relevance. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Jul 6, 2014 at 21:42
2
$\begingroup$

This is a partial answer. There exists an infinite group $G$ having no sequence of subsets $\{A_i\}$ such that $$ A_{n+1}A_{n+1}\subsetneq A_n, \quad\hbox{and}\quad \bigcap A_i=\{1\}. $$ (We omit the inverse condition but add the the intersection-triviality condition.)

Indeed, such a sequence defines a Hausdorff topology on the group where $A_i$ are neigbourhoods of $1$ and all other points are isolated. The multiplication is continuous at $(1,1)\in G\times G$ with respect to this topology. It remains to note that infinite locally non-topologizable groups do exist.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .