Does anyone have a list of matrix generators for a bunch of hyperbolic 3-manifold groups? I am testing an algorithm and am looking for a collection of test cases. I am looking for exact values of matrix elements as algebraic numbers, and not approximate values.
1 Answer
Grant Lakeland was kind enough to compute exact $PSL(2,\mathbb{C})$ representations for tetrahedral groups. The methods and formulas are written up on his webpage here.
Maclachlan and Reid give complete list of the arithmetic and non-arithmetic tetrahedral groups in $\S$13.1 and $\S$13.2 of their book, "The arithmetic of hyperbolic 3-manifolds."
As a warning if one should be careful about observing general phenomena from these groups. They are special a lot of ways.
However, if you want more that manifolds that not just covers of tetrahedral orbifolds, there are a few options. In the rest of section 13 of Maclachlan and Reid, (especially 'the arithmetic zoo'), they give information on the invariant trace fields of a number of manifolds. From this exact value, one can often guess and verify the algebraic numbers (most of the time these will be algebraic integers) for the entries of the generators.
Also, for general 3-manifold groups you probably want to use snap or you can use SAGE's snappy package (documentation is here) to get exact representation. Again, one has to extrapolate information from the trace field to get the entries of the generators express as algebraic numbers.
-
1$\begingroup$ Thanks! I will check these out (re Maclachlan-Reid, presumably invariant trace fields are not enough to actually reconstruct the manifold, so hopefully there is more info..) $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 21, 2013 at 14:03
-
$\begingroup$ @IgorRivin You are right that it's not enough to construct the manifolds. However, often you can get an integral representation of manifold over or if you are using software to guess at exact values from approximate ones, the tables in MacLachlan-Reid are a good sanity check. Finally, I forgot to mention Riley's Parabolic representations of knot groups I, plms.oxfordjournals.org/content/s3-24/2/217.full.pdf might be useful for you. In particular, Theorem 2 addresses your concerns directly. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 22, 2013 at 7:23