The ncatlab says:

Under suitable conditions it should be true that for $C$ a model category whose homotopy category $\mathrm{Ho}(C)$ is a triangulated category the homotopy category of a left Bousfield localization of $C$ is the left Bousfield localization of $\mathrm{Ho}(C)$.

I wholeheartedly agree. Does anyone know of results in this direction?


Let $\tilde C$ be the left Bousfield localization of $C$. As categories $C=\tilde C$, but $\tilde C$ has more weak equivalences. In particular, the identity functor induces a functor $\varphi\colon \operatorname{Ho}(C)\rightarrow \operatorname{Ho}(\tilde C)$. Let $\mathcal L=\ker \varphi$, i.e. $\mathcal L\subset \operatorname{Ho}(C)$ is the full subcategory spanned by the objects which become trivial in $\operatorname{Ho}(\tilde C)$. If $\tilde C$ is stable and $\varphi$ preserves homotopy colimits (and these are the suitable conditions, I think) then $\varphi$ is an exact functor between triangulated categories, so $\mathcal L$ is a thick subcategory of $\operatorname{Ho}(C)$ and $\varphi$ induces a functor from the Verdier quotient $\bar\varphi\colon\operatorname{Ho}(C)/\mathcal L\rightarrow \operatorname{Ho}(\tilde C)$. Let us show that $\bar\varphi$ is an equivalence of categories. It is enough to prove that the canonical composition of 'projection' functors $\tilde C=C\rightarrow\operatorname{Ho}(C)\rightarrow \operatorname{Ho}(C)/\mathcal L$ satisfies the universal property of $\tilde C\rightarrow \operatorname{Ho}(\tilde C)$. Suppose $\psi\colon C\rightarrow D$ is a functor which sends all weak equivalences in $\tilde C$ to isomorphisms. Since weak equivalences in $C$ are weak equivalences in $\tilde C$, $\psi$ factors through $C\rightarrow \operatorname{Ho}(C)$ in an essentially unique way. Let $\bar\psi\colon \operatorname{Ho}(C)\rightarrow D$ be the factorizaton. Recall that $\operatorname{Ho}(C)/\mathcal L$ is the localization of $\operatorname{Ho}(C)$ inverting those maps whose mapping cone is in $\mathcal L$. Any such map is represented by a zig-zag of weak equivalences in $\tilde C$. Since $\psi$ sends weak equivalences in $\tilde C$ to isomorphisms then $\bar\psi$ factors through $\operatorname{Ho}(C)\rightarrow \operatorname{Ho}(C)/\mathcal L$ in an essentially unique way. In particular $\psi$ factors through the composite $\tilde C\rightarrow \operatorname{Ho}(C)/\mathcal L$. The essential uniqueness of this factorization follows from the aforementioned essential uniqueness of the two intermediate steps. I hope this argument is correct and convincing, and that I haven't missed any necessary hypothesis.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot! I should have tried more seriously to see on my own if one can just prove this in a straight-forward manner. I guess the nlab entry made me think this was non-obvious and unknown. Is it okay if I put a link to this answer in the nlab entry? $\endgroup$ – Rasmus Jul 12 '13 at 15:08
  • $\begingroup$ You're welcome! You can link to this answer, or expand it conveniently. I think it's a little bit sketchy, isn't it? $\endgroup$ – Fernando Muro Jul 12 '13 at 15:20
  • $\begingroup$ I will put a link for now. In the future I will hopefully replace it with a more detailed version of your answer. $\endgroup$ – Rasmus Jul 12 '13 at 15:24
  • $\begingroup$ I am a bit puzzled by the condition that $\varphi$ preserve homotopy colimits because it seems to be a condition on the output data $\mathrm{Ho}(C)\to\mathrm{Ho}(\tilde C)$ and not (explicitly) on the input data $(C,\tilde C)$ (modulo the fact that there are no functorial homotopy (co)fibers in triangulated categories). Also, would it not be enough to have that $\varphi$ preserves finite coproducts and homotopy (co)fibers to get additivity and exactness, respectively? $\endgroup$ – Rasmus Aug 10 '13 at 8:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Preserving finite homotopy coproducts and homotopy cofibers is the same as preserving finite homotopy colimits, which is enough. As you said, this condition is really a condition on the model categories, or if you wish on the induced derivators, but not on the homotopy categories. I abused terminology. $\endgroup$ – Fernando Muro Aug 10 '13 at 12:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.