7
$\begingroup$

I am sure that this is well known in the right places, but: Is the C* completion of a star nuclear Fréchet algebra a nuclear C* algebra? (Suppose that the C* norm is continuous with respect to the Fréchet topology.)

[Basic, but commutative, example to explain topology - smooth functions on a compact manifold completed to continuous functions.]

To explain more: I expect that if the result was true, all that would be needed would be that the product and star were continuous. If we take continuous seminorms $\|.\|_1 \le \|.\|_2 \le \dots$ then likely we should have $\|a\,b\|_n\le C\, \|a\|_m\,\|b\|_m$ where $m,C$ just depend on $n$. By C* completion, this would be via some star representation of the algebra on a Hilbert space $H$, so that the map from the algebra to $B(H)$ was continuous.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Could you please explain what do you understand by a C*-completion of a nuclear Frechet algebra? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 24, 2013 at 17:05
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Specifically, what do you mean by a nuclear Frechet algebra? (Surely more than a Frechet algebra whose underlying top. vector space is nuclear?) $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Commented Jun 24, 2013 at 17:57
  • $\begingroup$ Will try to explain above $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 25, 2013 at 9:35
  • $\begingroup$ I'm still not entirely sure I understand the assumptions, but a possible counterexample might be a well-chosen subalgebra of the reduced group Cstar-algebra of a free group (or any other group with the rapid decay property) $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Commented Jun 25, 2013 at 10:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I know what it means for a Frechet space to be nuclear, but I don't know what you mean when you ask for a Frechet algebra to be nuclear. $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Commented Jun 26, 2013 at 22:14

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Counterexample.

I think the $C^\star$ algebra of the Free group on two generators $F_2$ is not a nuclear $C^\star$ algebra, same for the reduced group $C^\star$ algebra of $F_2$.

The finite support functions $c_f (F_2)$ is a dense subagebra of $C^\star(F_2)$, but is not Frechet.

Let $\ell$ be the word length of $F_2$. Let $\omega=e^\ell$, the exponentiated word length function on $F_2$. Then $\omega(gh) \leq \omega(g) \omega(h)$ for $g, h \in F_2$, and $\omega(e) = 1$.

Form rapidly vanishing complex-valued functions on $F_2$ using this "weight" $\omega$. I'll denote them by ${\cal S}^e(F_2)$, ${\cal S}$ for "Schwartz functions". There is a natural Fr'echet space topology on ${\cal S}^e(F_2)$, given by norms $\| \varphi \|_n = sup_{g \in F_2} w(g)^n |\varphi(g)|$. ${\cal S}^e(F_2)$ is naturally a Fr'echet algebra for convolution multiplication, because $\omega$ has the submultiplicative property. Also ${\cal S}^e(F_2)$ is nuclear, since the exponentiated word lenght function satisfies a summability condition $\sum_{g \in F_2} {1\over{e^{pl(g)}}} < \infty$ for some $p>0$. And ${\cal S}^e(F_2)$ is dense in the $C^\star$-algebra since it contains $c_f(F_2)$.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .