2
$\begingroup$

We know that the grand Riemann hypothesis is a generalisation of the Riemann hypothesis and Generalized Riemann hypothesis. My question is about the existence of a similar generalisation of the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$

3 Answers 3

Reset to default
3
$\begingroup$

The equivariant Tamagawa number conjecture generalizes the BSD conjecture. I am not sure if this is the most general conjecture available.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Reference can be found here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_values_of_L-functions $\endgroup$
    – Marc Palm
    Commented Apr 18, 2013 at 16:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ and here: mathoverflow.net/questions/96542/… $\endgroup$
    – Marc Palm
    Commented Apr 18, 2013 at 16:01
  • $\begingroup$ @ Marc Palm: Does there is a set of special L-functions where this conjecture apply just like the case of the Generalized Riemann hypothesis. $\endgroup$
    – Safwane
    Commented Apr 18, 2013 at 16:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes this class of functions are called motivic L-functions. Following Scholl you can attach a motive to the new form so those L-functions are motivic. Examples include Artin L-function and Hasse-Weil L-functions. $\endgroup$
    – Arijit
    Commented Apr 18, 2013 at 16:40
  • $\begingroup$ @ Arijit: Thank you very much for clarification. $\endgroup$
    – Safwane
    Commented Apr 18, 2013 at 16:46
4
$\begingroup$

The Bloch-Kato and Beilinson's conjectures. Here is an extremely pleasant write up on that http://www.claymath.org/programs/summer_school/2009/BellaicheNotes.pdf http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~nekovar/pu/mot.pdf http://wwwmath.uni-muenster.de/u/peter.schneider/publ/pap/beilin.ps

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I believe this is more special then the equivariant Tamagawa conjecture? $\endgroup$
    – Marc Palm
    Commented Apr 18, 2013 at 16:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes you are absolutely right. The equivariant version is of course general than TMC. $\endgroup$
    – Arijit
    Commented Apr 18, 2013 at 16:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ More references math.caltech.edu/papers/baltimore-final.pdf $\endgroup$
    – Arijit
    Commented Apr 18, 2013 at 16:18
4
$\begingroup$

A proof of ETNC => BSD can be found here: Guido Kings http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_I/preprints/Preprints2009/26-2009.pdf

For a generalisation of the BSD conjecture in positive characteristic to higher dimensional bases (over finite fields) see http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.5293 and http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.5294

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ Timo Keller: Received many thanks. $\endgroup$
    – Safwane
    Commented Oct 7, 2014 at 17:47

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .