The operator $E$ is defined as $Eu_n=u_{n+1}$.
I encountered a strange equality. when I tried out Let $u_n$ represent a series such that
$$u_{n+2}=u_{n+1}+u_n. \tag{$\star$}$$
Or $E^2{u_n}=Eu_{n+1}+Eu_n$
$\left(E^2-E-1\right)u_n=0$
$E\equiv \frac{1\pm \sqrt{5}}{2} $
What interpretation should be made on such an equality ?.
This equality seems interesting to me as two well know sequences that obeys$\huge\star$ Fibonacci sequence($u_1=u_2=1$) and Lucas sequence($u_1=1,u_2=3$) has it's $n$ th term represented by
$\Large {\frac{\left(\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)^n-\left(\frac{1-\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)^n}{\sqrt{5}}}$ and $\Large {\frac{\left(\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)^n+\left(\frac{1-\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)^n}{2}}$ respectively
If I am to follow that $E$ and $\frac{1\pm \sqrt{5}}{2} $. Then in case of the above two particular case of the recursion . The formula for the $n$ the term is not true(Of course I can't determine which sign($\pm$) should be taken and hence such an argument is bad).But interestingly , when we assume the same value for $E$, $\huge \star$ is valid with both the signs(the $\pm$).
I am really interested with such an equivalence, as I think it's interpretation can be exploited for a proof of those formulas. And also possibly a general solution. As
$E^n{u_n}=u_{n+1}$