1
$\begingroup$

Let $G$ be a connected, simply connected, solvable, complex Lie group with a discrete subgroup $\Gamma$. Let also $G_a$ be Hochshild-Mostow hull of $G$, i.e., there exists a solvable linear algebraic group $G_a =({\mathbb C}^*)^k \ltimes G$ such that $G_a$ contains $G$ as a Zariski dense, topologically closed, normal complex subgroup.

Is it true that algebraic closure of $\Gamma$ and $G$ in $G_a$ are the same?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What is the "algebraic closure" of a group? (I guess you must mean Zariski closure?) $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 4, 2012 at 5:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Could I take $\Gamma$ to be $\{1\}$? $\endgroup$
    – Ben McKay
    Commented Aug 4, 2012 at 10:07
  • $\begingroup$ $\Gamma$ is a lattice!! $\endgroup$
    – user13559
    Commented Aug 4, 2012 at 20:47
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ It would be helpful is your title were a complete sentence! $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 24, 2012 at 0:23

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Although you have not stated it this way, I will assume that $\Gamma $ is a lattice in a connected linear complex solvable Lie group $G$. If $\rho G \rightarrow GL_n({\mathbb C})$ is a holomorphic representation of $G$, it can be proved that the Zariski closure of $G$ and $\Gamma $ are the same. Suppose that the Zariski closures are $G'$ and $H'$ resp.

$G'/H'$ is affine and you cannot have a non-constant holomorphic map from the compact complex manifold $G/\Gamma $ into an affine space (by the maximal modulus principle).

You don't really need to use that $G'/H'$ is affine, and can argue by induction on the dimension of $G'/H'$ (using the solvability of $G'$)

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Actually, it turns out that if $G$ is a connected linear complex Lie group and $\Gamma \subset G$ is a lattice, then the Zariski closure of $\Gammma $ and of $G$ are the same in any linear representation of $G$. This follows from the solvable case as above and semi-simple case by the Borel density theorem (easier for the complex lie group case). One can put these cases together thanks to a theorem of Auslander on lattices in a semi-direct product of a solvable and a semi-simple group. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 10, 2012 at 2:31

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .