2
$\begingroup$

Assume $\Gamma$ is a discrete subgroup of some $GL_n$, and let $G$ be its Zariski closure. Let $H$ an algebraic cocompact normal subgroup of $G$. Do we have that $H\cap \Gamma$ is of finite index in $\Gamma$. I'm not sure this is true (actually i think it should be false), i'm far from being an expert in this field, and i don't have any couterexample yet.

Many thanks

$\endgroup$
10
  • $\begingroup$ Can you define a Zariski discrete subgroup, which is not finite? $\endgroup$
    – Marc Palm
    Jul 17, 2013 at 15:17
  • $\begingroup$ thanks for your answer. "Can you define a Zariski discrete subgroup, which is not finite?", i can't :) . i'm not sure i really get your counterexample. in this case $\overline{\Gamma}^{Zar}$ should be the lower unipotent matrices with coefficients in $\mathbb{R}$ (am i right ? ), and $H$ is not a cocompact subgroup ? $\endgroup$
    – user37253
    Jul 17, 2013 at 15:24
  • $\begingroup$ Assuming your field is real or complex numbers, the statement is true. The point is that modulo a compact normal subgroup of $G$, the group $H$ has finite index in $G$. $\endgroup$
    – Misha
    Jul 17, 2013 at 15:28
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry I confused H being cocompact in GL(n) versus in Gamma:( $\endgroup$
    – Marc Palm
    Jul 17, 2013 at 15:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MarcPalm: That would be the only reasonable (and quite common) interpretation. $\endgroup$
    – Misha
    Jul 17, 2013 at 15:40

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

This is not true. There are irreducible (arithmetic) lattices $\Gamma=G({\mathbb Z})$ in $$SL _2({\mathbb R})\times SU(2)=G({\mathbb R})$$ such that $\Gamma$ projects densely into $SU(2)$ and its projection to $SL_2({\mathbb R})$ is a cocompact lattice. $G$ is an algebraic $\mathbb Q$-subgroup of $GL_n$ and the Zariski closure of $\Gamma$ is not $H= SL_2({\mathbb R})$ but it is $G({\mathbb R})$. $H$ is an algebraic co-compact normal subgroup of $G({\mathbb R})$ but its intersection with $\Gamma$ is only the trivial element.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Do you really want to say Gamma = G(Z)? $\endgroup$
    – Marc Palm
    Jul 18, 2013 at 7:31
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for clarifying. The formulation "There are..." followed by naming a specific lattice confused me;) $\endgroup$
    – Marc Palm
    Jul 18, 2013 at 9:44
  • $\begingroup$ this is not a specific lattice; there are many $\mathbb Z$ structures on $G({\mathbb R})$. $\endgroup$ Jul 19, 2013 at 15:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.