2
$\begingroup$

This is a follow-up to an older question.

Let $r\in \mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{Q}$, let $\mathbb{N}$ denote the set of non-negative integers and let $\mathbb{N}_+=\mathbb{N}\setminus\{0\}$. For $n\in\mathbb{N}_+$ let $$\alpha_r(n)=\min\{|r-\frac{m}{n}|: m\in\mathbb{N}\}$$ be the best approximation of $r$ that can be obtained using $n$ as the denominator.

We inductively define $\text{appr}_r:\mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}$, the approximation sequence of $r$:

  • $\text{appr}_r(0) = 1$, and
  • $\text{appr}_r(n+1) = \min\{m\in\mathbb{N}: m \geq \text{appr}_r(n) \text{ and } \alpha_r(m) < \alpha_r(\text{appr}_r(n))\}$ for all $n\in \mathbb{N}$.

For $A\subseteq {\mathbb N}$ we say that $A$ is thin if $\lim\sup_{n\to\infty}\frac{|A\,\cap \,\{1,\ldots,n+1\}|}{n+1} = 0.$ We say that $r\in\mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{Q}$ is almost rational if the image of $\text{appr}_r$ is a thin subset of $\mathbb{N}$.

Question. Is there an almost rational $r\in\mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{Q}$?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ A better question is: Are there "not almost rational numbers"? The answer is all irrational numbers are "almost rational" in your sense. All terms in your approximation sequence are denominators of convergents and semiconvergents of $r$ (see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continued_fraction ). That set is thin for any irrational number. $\endgroup$ Commented May 1, 2023 at 13:03

0

You must log in to answer this question.