1
$\begingroup$

I am reading a preprint and I do not quite follow a seemingly known fact:

Let $E$ be an elliptic curve on the real projective plane with two real components. Let $O\subset E$ the oval component (apologies to the elliptic curve "groupies", I couldn't think of a better symbol. The authors also use $O$). Then the paper says that if we apply a Cremona transformation with three base points on the projective plane such that $O$ has one or three base points and $E\backslash O$ has the remaining base points, then the oval will transform into a non-oval and vice versa. I do not immediately see this. I have tried to compute this with particular elliptic curves and this is indeed true. But why is this true in general?

Below is the Mathematica code I use to investigate this :

Remove@"Global`*"

totalDeg:=Exponent[# /. ((# -> \[FormalX] RandomReal[]) & /@ Variables[#]), \[FormalX]] &;
homogenize[f_,z_,vars_]:= z^totalDeg[f]*Expand[f /. ((#->#/z)&/@vars)]//Expand;
homogenize[f_,z_] := homogenize[f,z,Variables[f]];

(*Cremona with 1 base points on oval and 2 on non-oval*)
f = x(x-1)(x-2);
f = f /.  {x -> 3*Sqrt[2] x};
f = f/12 - y^2;
f=f/.{x->1/Sqrt[2]x+1/Sqrt[2]y,y->1/Sqrt[2]x-1/Sqrt[2]y};
F = homogenize[f,w]

cp = ContourPlot[f==0,{x,-1,1},{y,-1,1}];
sol = NSolve[{f==0,x==0.5},Reals];
pt ={x,y}/.sol[[1]];
gpt = Graphics[{Red, PointSize[0.01], Point[pt]}];
Show[cp,gpt]

G = F/.{w->1/(w+x+y)+1/x+1/y, x->1/x, y->1/y}
G = Numerator@Together@G
g = G/.{w->1}

pt = {w,x,y}/.{w->1/(w-x-y)-1/x-1/y, x->1/x, y->1/y};
pt = pt/.{w->1};
pt = pt/.sol[[1]];
pt = pt/pt[[1]];
pt = pt[[2;;3]]

gpt = Graphics[{Red, PointSize[0.01], Point[pt]}];
cp = ContourPlot[g-0.01==0,{x,-3,3},{y,-3,3}];
Show[cp,gpt]

(*Cremona with 3 base points on oval and 0 on non-oval*)
f = x(x-2)(x-3);
f = f /.  {x -> Sqrt[2] x};
f = f/4 - y^2;
f=f/.{x->1/Sqrt[2]x+1/Sqrt[2]y,y->1/Sqrt[2]x-1/Sqrt[2]y};
F = homogenize[f,w]

cp = ContourPlot[f==0,{x,-1,1},{y,-1,1}];
sol = NSolve[{f==0,x==0.5},Reals];
pt ={x,y}/.sol[[1]];
gpt = Graphics[{Red, PointSize[0.01], Point[pt]}];
Show[cp,gpt]

G = F/.{w->1/(w+x+y)+1/x+1/y, x->1/x, y->1/y}
G = Numerator@Together@G
g = G/.{w->1}

pt = {w,x,y}/.{w->1/(w-x-y)-1/x-1/y, x->1/x, y->1/y};
pt = pt/.{w->1};
pt = pt/.sol[[1]];
pt = pt/pt[[1]];
pt = pt[[2;;3]]

gpt = Graphics[{Red, PointSize[0.01], Point[pt]}];
cp = ContourPlot[g==0,{x,-1.5,1.5},{y,-1.5,1.5}];
Show[cp,gpt]

Below are the figure showing that the oval changes to non-oval and vice versa (I marked a point on one component and its image with red dots to know what is changed). My base points are $(0,0),(1,0)$ and $(0,1)$ on the affine plane.

Cremona transformation from one base point on the oval and two base points on the non-oval. enter image description hereenter image description here

Cremona transformation from three base points on the oval and no base point on the non-oval. enter image description hereenter image description here

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Are you familiar with the operation of blowing up in general, i.e. do you understand what the Cremona transformation is doing geometrically? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 17, 2023 at 17:36
  • $\begingroup$ Are you trying to say that this is clear because of blowing up at the base points? Because I don't see this. If two of the base points are not on the curve and one is on the oval then the oval can remain an oval. $\endgroup$
    – Jose Capco
    Commented Apr 17, 2023 at 18:47

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Let $\varphi\colon \mathbb{P}^2\dashrightarrow\mathbb{P}^2$ be the quadratic birational map centered at the real points $p_1,p_2,p_3$. The image of the oval $O$ is a connected component of the image $\varphi(E)$, that is again a smooth curve of degree $3$. Then, take a general line $L$ of $\mathbb{P}^2$, it intersects $\varphi(E)$ into three distinct points $r_1,r_2,r_3$. One of them is real, the two others are either real or both non-real and conjugate. In that latter case, the real point is on the non-oval connected component of $\varphi(E)$. The preimage $\varphi^{-1}(L)$ is a conic through $p_1,p_2,p_3$ (and any such conic is obtained this way). This conic intersects $E$ in six points, so $p_1,p_2,p_3$ and three other points $q_1,q_2,q_3$. Again, one of the points is real and the two others are either real or non-real and conjugate. These three points $q_1,q_2,q_3$ are the preimage of $r_1,r_2,r_3$. You need to check how many of these are real points on $O$ and how many are on $E\setminus O$.

In your case, you suppose that one (say $p_1$) or three ($p_1,p_2,p_3$) of the point lie on $O$. As $O$ is an oval, a conic will touch it into an even number of points (you need to go in and then out). So you get always one real point of the conic touching $O$. This proves that $\varphi(O)$ is a non-oval. Hence, $\varphi(O\setminus E)$ is an oval.

$\endgroup$
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .