5
$\begingroup$

I have just started reading Hain's paper On the Universal Elliptic KZB Connection. I am a bit confused about a comment made there about base points on orbifolds. I am still very new to the idea of orbifolds so I apologise in advance for this likely being very trivial.

Let $\mathcal{E}\to\mathcal{M}_{1,1}$ denote the universal elliptic curve over the moduli space of genus 1 curves with 1 marked point (over the complex numbers). Following Hain's Lectures on moduli spaces of elliptic curves, I am thinking about these as Riemann surfaces in the category of orbifolds, although they are also treated as stacks in the present paper. Let $\mathcal{E}'$ denote $\mathcal{E}$ with its identity section removed (i.e. the "universal punctured elliptic curve"). On page 5 Hain writes:

A non-zero point $x$ on an elliptic curve $E$ determines (and is determined by) an orbifold map $[E,x]: \mathbb{C}\to\mathcal{E}'$.

I don't really understand why this is. The picture in my head is that a point of $\mathcal{E}'$ is (roughly) a nonzero point $x$ on some elliptic curve $E$. Therefore constant maps $\mathbb{C}\to \mathcal{E}'$ correspond to pairs $[E,x]$ as above. But I don't understand why other possibly nonconstant maps $\mathbb{C}\to\mathcal{E}'$ should also correspond to such a pair $[E,x]$. Or are all such maps constant?

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

It is indeed true that a holomorphic map $\mathbb C \to \mathcal E'$ is constant. This is because it must factor through the universal cover of $\mathcal E'$, since $\mathbb C$ is simply connected. But the universal cover is a product of two copies of the complex unit disk, so the result follows by the maximum principle.

Nevertheless I don't think that this is what he meant. My guess is that he accidentally left out the word "Spec", so that he meant to say that maps $\mathrm{Spec}\,\mathbb C \to \mathcal E'$ are canonically in bijection with pairs $(E,x)$ of an elliptic curve and a non-identity point.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you Dan - it's nice to know my intuition isn't completely off! $\endgroup$ – Alex Saad May 13 '17 at 14:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.