11
$\begingroup$

Consider the Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff formula (Wikipedia page): $$Z(X,Y) := X + Y + \frac{1}{2}[X,Y] + \frac{1}{12}[X,[X,Y]] - \frac{1}{12}[Y,[X,Y]] + \dotsb$$

Many sources, including the Wikipedia page, have an explicit expression for the terms, so the question I'm asking should be answerable just from that expression.

For a prime $p$ and a natural number $n$, denote by $f(p,n)$ the largest $k$ such that, if we truncate the formula to terms that involve products of length at most $n$, then one or more of the denominators is divisible by $p^k$. Note that this truncation is valid when we are working in a situation of nilpotency class $n$.

It's pretty easy to see that $f(p,n) = 0$ for $n < p$, and is nonzero for $n \ge p$.

My question: Is there a direct explicit expression for $f(p,n)$ (or a sandwiching of it between two fairly close expressions)? For instance, inspection of the first few terms suggests that $f(2,n) = n - 1$, but I'm not sure how to derive this from the general expression.

Analogue: In the power series for the exponential $e^x$, the analogue to $f(p,n)$ is the sum $[n/p] + [n/p^2] + [n/p^3] + \dotsb$ where $[\,\cdot\,]$ denotes the greatest integer function.

UPDATE: Chapter 3 of the Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics vol. 1674 by Klaas, Leedham-Green, and Plesken contains some estimates. However: (i) I'm not sure all the numerical calculations there are correct, since they don't agree with others I have seen, (ii) the authors aren't concerned about the precise growth of $f(p,n)$ — they only care that it grows slowly enough that the series converges under certain conditions.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Lazard in Michel Lazard: "Groupes analytiques $p$-adiques", Publ. IHES, 26 has results on the p-adic convergence of the BCH formula. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 25, 2010 at 4:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The best I know is that the multiplicity of $p$ in the denominators of the terms of length $\leq n$ is at most $(n-1)/(p-1)$. The proof follows from the elementary observation that if $v_p(x)\geq1/(p-1)$ then $v_p(e^x-1)\geq1/(p-1)$ and $\log(1+x)\geq1/(p-1)$. See the above-mentioned paper of Lazard. I don't know any intelligent lower estimates of the multiplicity, however $\endgroup$
    – Pavol S.
    Commented Feb 14, 2011 at 21:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks Trial! I learned about that upper bound through some other source (outside Math Overflow) using the method you suggested, shortly after posting the question, and that was precisely what I needed, so I forgot about the question still being on Math Overflow. $\endgroup$
    – Vipul Naik
    Commented Feb 15, 2011 at 2:05

1 Answer 1

9
$\begingroup$

If the homogeneous component $Z_n(X,Y)$ of $Z(X,Y)$ of degree $n$ is represented in the Lyndon basis $\mathcal{L}_n$, or in any basis $\mathcal{B}_n$ whose transformation matrix $T_{\mathcal{L_n}\to\mathcal{B_n}}$ has determinant $\pm 1$, then an explicit formula for the exponent $f(p,n)$ of the highest power of $p$ that divides the least common multiple of the denominators of the coefficients of $Z_n(X,Y)$ is given by $$ f(p,n)=\frac{n-s_p(n)}{p-1}+\lfloor\log_p(s_p(n))\rfloor. $$ Here, $s_p(n)=\alpha_0+\ldots+\alpha_r$ denotes the sum of the digits in the $p$-adic expansion $n=\alpha_0+\alpha_1p+\ldots+\alpha_r p^r$, $0\leq\alpha_i<p$, and $\log_p$ is the logarithm to base $p$.

This follows in a straightforward way from the analogous statement for the coefficients of $Z_n(X,Y)$ represented as a polynomial in the non-commuting variables $X$, $Y$, which was proved in

Harald Hofstätter, Smallest common denominators for the homogeneous components of the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff series, arXiv:2010.03818.

Bases $\mathcal{B}_n$ with transformation matrix $T_{\mathcal{L_n}\to\mathcal{B_n}}$ with determinant $\pm 1$ include all Hall bases, and also the rightnormed basis of E.S.Chibrikov.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .