7
$\begingroup$

Several years ago, I mentioned offhandedly to a colleague that I had noticed that, if you extend the $\mathsf E_n$ series downwards in the natural way, by removing nodes from the long arm of $\mathsf E_8$, then the fundamental group of $\mathsf E_n$ (i.e., the quotient of the weight lattice by the root lattice) is cyclic of order $9 - n$ for $3 \le n \le 8$. (Specifically, $\mathsf E_5 = \mathsf D_5$, $\mathsf E_4 = \mathsf A_4$, and $\mathsf E_3 = \mathsf A_2 + \mathsf A_1$.) I thought that this was just a funny coincidence, but my colleague said that there was actually more to it, and gave me a beautiful explanation of the deeper reason.

Unfortunately, as is the way of such things, I did not write down the beautiful explanation and so forgot it; and, upon reaching out to my colleague several years later, I find that they can no longer re-construct their beautiful explanation. Can you provide any explanation other than "that's how it works out"?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

8
$\begingroup$

If we define the $E_n$ lattice in the algebraic geometer's way as the orthogonal complement of $(1,\dots, 1, 3)$ in the Lorentzian unimodular lattice $I_{n,1}$, i.e. in $\mathbb Z^{n+1}$ with intersection form $$\langle(x_1,\dots, x_{n+1}), (y_1,\dots, y_{n+1})\rangle =x_1y_1 + x_2 y_2 + \dots + x_n y_n - x_{n+1} y_{n+1}, $$

then there is an immediate proof: because $(1,\dots, 1, 3)$ is a primitive vector of norm $9-n$ and the complement of a primitive vector of norm $k$ in a unimodular lattice always has fundamental group of norm $k$ (with the isomorphism of the dual lattice modulo the lattice to $\mathbb Z/k$ on the dual lattice given by the pairing with that vector).

One can check that the lattice given by this construction has the $E_n$ Dynkin diagram for all $n\geq 3$ using the roots given by all vectors with a series of $0$s, then a $1$, then a $-1$, then a series of at least one $0$, and the vector $(0,\dots, 0,1,1,1,1)$.


Another perspective:

For any series of Dynkin diagrams where we add one vertex after a number in a line, a simple recurrence shows the determinant of the Cartan matrix (= order of the fundamental group) of the $n$th member of the series must be a linear function of $n$. Finding the right linear function for $E_n$ then requires computing two examples.

Given that the fundamental group has order $9-n$ for $n\geq 3$, the fact that it is cyclic is nontrivial only for $n=5$, so not much of a coincidence.


A third perspective: A $k$-torsion element of the dual lattice modulo the lattice is the same thing as an element of the lattice tensor $\mathbb Z/k$ with zero dot product with every vector of the lattice, i.e. a $\mathbb Z/k$-linear combination of the simple roots with zero dot product with any root. These can be calculated directly from the Dynkin diagram.

On an $E_n$-type lattice, if the value at the vertices near the end are

$$ \begin{array}{ccc} a & b & c \\ d & & \end{array}$$

then $a=2d$ and $a+c=2b$ and $b=2c$ so $a=3c$ so because $2d=3c$ we have $c=2(d-c)$, $b= 4(d-c)$, $a=6(d-c)$, and $c=3(d-c)$, and then, continuing left, every vertex is a multiple of $d-c$. This shows every element of the fundamental group is a multiple of

$$ \begin{array}{ccc} \dots & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 4 & 2 \\&&&&& 3 & & \end{array}$$

showing the fundamental group is cyclic, and this element is $9-n$-torsion since it is only satisfies the orthogonality condition in $\mathbb Z/k$ if the label $9-n$ of the unique vertex of $E_{n+1}$ that's missing in $E_n$ is divisible by $k$, showing the fundamental group is cyclic of order $9-k$.

This proof, despite appearances, works for $n=3$, where we just have the additional relation $a=0$ to work with.


All three arguments work for $n>9$ as well as $n\leq 8$, with the first and third arguments still determining the fundamental group and the second argument determining its order.

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ I am a bit confused by the third argument, doubtlessly entirely my fault. Your generator of the fundamental group is the highest root of $\mathsf E_8$, which means it's not orthogonal to the $\mathsf E_8$ weights (but maybe the dots indicate that I should extend it in some way so it is?), and, more importantly, it seems to live in the wrong space—it is written as a linear combination of roots involving the "$8$th simple root" of $\mathsf E_8$ non-trivially, so can't possibly lie in $\mathbb Q\mathsf E_n$ for $n < 8$. What am I misunderstanding? $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Sep 19, 2022 at 12:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @LSpice Let me say it like this. Take the highest root of $E_8$. Restrict the linear combination to $E_n$ by throwing away the coefficients of roots that are not in $E_n$. You now have a vector of $E_n$. You now divide by the coefficient of the unique root in $E_{n+1}$ that's not in $E_n$. You now have a vector in $\mathbb Q E_n$, which as a vector in $\mathbb Q E_n/ E_n$ is orthogonal to all the roots of $E_n$. $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Commented Sep 19, 2022 at 13:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @LSpice Why? The original vector was orthogonal to every root but the last one, truncating only changes the dot product with roots of $E_n$ adjacent to roots you deleted, there's only one root you deleted adjacent to roots of $E_n$, and so the dot product is only changed by the coefficient of that root, which after dividing is $1$, so $0$ after modding out by integers. The argument can be generalized to show that for every graph made by gluing three paths at a point, the "fundamental group" is cyclic if the lengths of two of the paths are relatively prime. $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Commented Sep 19, 2022 at 13:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @LSpice You have interpreted the second argument in exactly the spirit it was meant. $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Commented Sep 19, 2022 at 13:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @LSpice If you define the fundamental group as the quotient of the duall lattice by the lattice, now allowing indefinite lattices, it means the fundamental group has order $|9-n|$ for all $n \neq 9$. $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Commented Sep 30, 2022 at 0:31

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .