I am currently reading "Smoothing of Multivariate Data" by Klemela. It contains Lemma 11.6, which upper and lower bounds the KL-divergence of two densities in terms of the $L_{2}$-metric. The Lemma specifically states the following 2 bounds without proof:
Upper bound
Let $f, f_{0}$ be densities. In particular, if $\inf _{x \in \mathbf{R}^{d}} f_{0}(x)>0$, then $$ D_{K}^{2}\left(f, f_{0}\right) \leq \frac{\left\|f-f_{0}\right\|_{2}^{2}}{\inf _{x \in \mathbf{R}^{d} f_{0}(x)}} $$
Lower bound
Also, if $f$ and $f_{0}$ are both bounded and bounded away from zero, then $$ D_{K}^{2}\left(f, f_{0}\right) \geq \int_{\left\{x \in \mathbf{R}^{d}: f_{0}(x)>0\right\}}\left(f-f_{0}\right)+C\left\|f-f_{0}\right\|_{2}^{2} $$ for a positive constant $C$.
I can prove the upper bound rigorously as follows: \begin{align} D_{K}^{2}(f, f_{0}) &\leq \chi^{2}(f || f_{0}) \tag{well known upper bound} \\ &=: \int_{\left\{x \in \mathbf{R}^{d}: f_{0}(x)>0\right\}} \frac{\left(f-f_{0}\right)^{2}}{f_{0}} \tag{by definition} \\ &\leq \frac{1}{\inf _{x \in \mathbf{R}^{d} f_{0}(x)}} \int_{\left\{x \in \mathbf{R}^{d}: f_{0}(x)>0\right\}} \left(f-f_{0}\right)^{2} \tag{since $\inf$ exists.} \\ &=: \frac{\left\|f-f_{0}\right\|_{2}^{2}}{\inf _{x \in \mathbf{R}^{d} f_{0}(x)}} \end{align}
Note here that the definition of the KL divergence used in the Lemma is as follows:
If $f$ and $g$ are densities of $P$ and $Q$ with respect to the Lebesgue measure, then we may write $$ D_{K}^{2}(f, g)=\int_{\mathbf{R}^{d} \cap\{x: g(x)>0\}} f \log _{e}\left(\frac{f}{g}\right) $$
I'm unsure on how to prove the lower bound. Some comments (for the lower bound to hold):
- It appears that the densities here must also be bounded above (else see first counterexample here).
- Since the densities are assumed to be bounded above and positively bounded from below over their common support, the support set in $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ must also be bounded (else see second counterexample here).
Could anyone please show how to prove this lower bound rigorously (or provide a citable rigorous proof reference)? Also, if I've made a mistake in my two comments above, please also let me know.
Aside: I had originally posted this on math.SE. To respect math.overflow cross-posting etiquette, I've deleted that post due to no responses. I realized that it had also been asked there before without any suitable responses. Since it is a research related question with no well citable proof, I believe it is fair to post here on math.overflow to settle the issue.