2
$\begingroup$

Let us consider the Riemann Zeta function non-trivial zeros $\rho_{n}=\frac{1}{2} + i\gamma_{n}$.

Let us now consider the following sum: $\tau (n)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\sin(k)\sin(\gamma _{k})$

where:

$\gamma _{1}=14.1347251417346\ldots$

$\gamma _{2}=21.0220396387715\ldots$

$\gamma _{3}=25.0108575801456\ldots$

etc

This is the plot of $\tau (n)$ for $n$ between 1 and $10^4$:

Plot 1

My question is: does anyone know any articles where this periodicity is investigated? 

$\endgroup$
8
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Does $\rho_n$ denote the real part of the zero, or the zero itself? If the former, (many more than) the first $10^n$ have real part 1/2; why not just write that? If the latter, I don't understand the point of your first sentence. $\endgroup$
    – Stopple
    Commented Jul 1, 2022 at 22:01
  • $\begingroup$ @Stopple edited, thanks. $\endgroup$
    – Salvo
    Commented Jul 1, 2022 at 22:04
  • $\begingroup$ Can you include the figure in the post, not as a link? $\endgroup$
    – Amir Sagiv
    Commented Jul 2, 2022 at 4:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AmirSagiv: One needs 10 reputation points before being allowed to embed a figure. See meta.stackexchange.com/questions/75491/…. $\endgroup$
    – jeq
    Commented Jul 2, 2022 at 15:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Usually $\rho_n$ denotes the complex nontrivial zeros, written $\beta_n+i\gamma_n$; on the Riemann hypothesis $\beta_n=1/2$. With this notation $\sin(\rho_n)$ and thus $\tau(n)$ are complex numbers, not real valued. Either your $\tau(n)$ is actually the real part of your sum, or you are evaluating $\sin(\gamma_n)$, not $\sin(\rho_n)$. $\endgroup$
    – Stopple
    Commented Jul 5, 2022 at 17:34

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Assume

$$N(t)=\sum_{\Im(\rho)\le t} 1\tag{1}$$

is the non-trivial zeta zero counting function which counts the number of non-trivial zeta zeros in the upper-half plane with $\Im(\rho)\le t$.


The periodicity in

$$\tau(n)=\sum_{k=1}^n \sin(k) \sin (\gamma_k)\tag{2}$$

where $\gamma_k=\Im(\rho_k)$ is probably related to the following estimate of $N(t)$:

$$\tilde{N}(t)=\frac{t}{2 \pi} \left(\log\left(\frac{t}{2 \pi}\right)-1\right)+\frac{1}{2}\, \log(2 \pi)\tag{3}$$


Consider the following approximation to $\tau(n)$

$$\tilde{\tau}(n)=\sum_{k=1}^n \sin(k) \sin (\tilde{\gamma}_k)\tag{4}$$

where $\tilde{\gamma}_k$ refers to the root of $\tilde{N}(t)-k=0$ which is an estimate of the imaginary part of the $k^{th}$ zeta zero in the upper-half plane.


The following plot illustrates $\tau(n)$ defined in formula (2) above in blue and $\tilde{\tau}(n)$ defined in formula (4) above in orange.

Illustration of formulas (2) and (4)

Figure (1): Illustration of formula (2) for $\tau(n)$ (blue) and formula (4) for $\tilde{\tau}(n)$ (orange)


While $\tilde{\tau}(n)$ may not be a particularly good approximation of $\tau(n)$, Figure (1) above illustrates the oscillation in $\tau(n)$ seems to be related to the approximate regularity of $\Im(\rho_k)$.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .