MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Building on this question: Zeros of $\zeta(s) \pm \zeta(1-s)$, I experimented further with:

$$\zeta(s) \pm \zeta(\overline s)$$

Assuming $s=\sigma + ti$, I observed that this function also has many "semi-trivial" as well as "non-trivial" zeros for each $\sigma$. Furthermore these "non-trivial" zeros all seem to reside very close to the Riemann non trivial zeros at $\sigma=\frac12$.

However, what I found curious is that only when $\frac12 < \sigma < 1$ the function:

$$\zeta(s) + \zeta(\overline s)$$

suddenly loses all of its "non-trivial" zeros (i.e. the ones near the Riemann zeros), whilst still retaining all of its "semi-trivial" zeros (they disappear when $\sigma >1$). Is there a logical explanation or even proof for this?


In an attempt to find out more, I used the alternating zeta-function $\eta(s)$ and rewrote it as:

$$\eta(s) - \eta(\overline s) =\displaystyle 2i \sum _{n=1}^{\infty } \frac{e^{\pi i n} \sin(t \ln(n))}{n^\sigma}$$


$$\eta(s) + \eta(\overline s) =\displaystyle 2i \sum _{n=1}^{\infty } \frac{e^{\pi i n} \cos(t \ln(n))}{n^\sigma}$$

These functions look very symmetrical, but it seems that the denominator $n^\sigma$ drives the infinite alternating sum of the cosines to always positive near the non-trivial zeros whilst keeping the semi-trivial ones intact, when $\sigma > \frac12$. Could these functions be rewritten as an integral?

share|cite|improve this question
Your functions are just the real and imaginary parts of the zeta function. – John Pardon Apr 2 '12 at 4:48
As unknown points out your functions are related to the real and imaginary parts of zeta: $ \zeta(s)=\overline{\zeta(\overline{s})}$. Certainly there are a lot of zeros with Re(s) in (1/2,1), how do you define "close to a zeta zero"? – joro Apr 2 '12 at 6:59

As "unknown" points out your functions are related to the real and imaginary parts of zeta: $ \zeta(s)=\overline{\zeta(\overline{s})}$.

Not sure your statement that $\zeta(s) + \zeta(\overline{s})$ "suddenly loses all of its "non-trivial" zeros (i.e. the ones near the Riemann zeros)" is correct.

There are a lot of zeros with $\frac12 < \sigma < 1$.

Here are the first few zeros in the above interval found with sage:

0.50462947732965045372 + 21.0i
0.52448011283041710992 + 30.379693112598828167i
0.58339455491020710687 + 30.0i
0.53642761519952422834 + 33.0i
0.65407326676423894749 + 47.747059280547112743i
0.50578106968814753741 + 48.0i
0.5282879698726187585 + 49.840960886611267987i
0.55323613245493607226 + 50.0i
0.50688116551268832104 + 53.0i
0.53003774683011668413 + 60.851647312217356793i
0.51632607137165855174 + 59.0i
0.696668107848621598 + 61.381499982325861301i
0.65871381704750571336 + 61.0i
0.54078375897341852744 + 65.06334913779052855i
0.57819848053572496195 + 65.0i
0.51405235699573598995 + 69.642351828461338856i
0.57314472284372395716 + 75.0i
0.65581349324544466194 + 89.0i
0.54628477636795993949 + 92.0i
0.52175065892232430153 + 94.608107654221020801i
0.61139715426268535099 + 96.0i
share|cite|improve this answer
@Joro: I have tried to illustrate my point in the attached graph I believe that a true non trivial zero $t_1 =14.134725...$ at $\sigma=\frac12$ always has a counterpart $t_1'$ that moves closer or further away depending on the $\sigma$. However, when $\sigma > \frac12$, both zeros disappear and become f.i. point B when $\sigma = \frac23$. There are also "semi-trivial zeros" on the right that are not connected to the non-trivial zeros and remain zero (e,g, point A on the yellow curve) and only when $\sigma > 1$ these do also disappear. – Agno Apr 2 '12 at 18:01
However... ...after more carefully looking at the precise point where both zeros disappear, I found that the tilting value for $\sigma$ (for specifically both $t_1$ and $t_1'$ to disappear as zeros) does actually lie slightly above $\frac12$. So, back to the drawing board. – Agno Apr 2 '12 at 18:13

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.