3
$\begingroup$

Given 2-tangles $T_1,T_2\subset B^3$ with their endpoints at some fixed points NW, NE, SW, SE of $\partial B^3$ we can glue them along $\partial B^3$ to obtain a link $L=T_1\cup T_2\subset S^3.$

Q: Does that link $L$ together with $T_1$ determine the homeomorphism class of $(B^3,T_2)$?

Remarks

  1. Note that $L$ and $T_1$ do not determine the isotopy class of $T_2$ (within the space of tangles with endpoints at NW, NE, SW, SE, fixed on $\partial B^3$).
  2. More generally, any 3-manifolds $M_1,M_2$ glued along their boundaries or partial boundaries, $S\hookrightarrow M_1, S\hookrightarrow M_2$, form a 3-manifold $N=M_1\cup_S M_2$. However $N$ and $M_1$ do not determine the homeomorphism class of $M_2$ in general.
$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Although you can't expect this kind of uniqueness in general, there are broad situations where uniqueness does occur. It stems from considering the 2-sheeted branched covering space of the link in $S^3$ and the JSJ-decomposition of that. The manuscript of Bonahon and Siebenmann covers this in detail. It can be found on Francis Bonahon's website. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 6, 2022 at 20:03
  • $\begingroup$ @RyanBudney: Indeed, but my understanding is that for the double branched covering approach, one would need to assume that at least one of $T_1$ and $T_2$ (or likely both) need to be algebraic, so that their double cover is a graph manifold. $\endgroup$
    – Adam
    Commented Feb 7, 2022 at 1:05
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think the answer is quite that simple. Bonahon and Siebenmann consider that special case, but there is a general machine for this problem. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 7, 2022 at 1:14

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

No, $L$ and $T_1$ together do not determine $T_2$. Take a non-trivial knot $K$ and suppose that $L$ is $K\#K$, and $T_1$ is the trivial tangle. Then $T_2$ can certainly be:

  • a 2-tangle with one boundary-parallel component, and one with a boundary-parallel component connected-summed with $L$;
  • a 2-tangle with two boundary-parallel components, each connected-sum with a copy of $K$.

I think you can do similar examples when $L$ and $T_2$ are prime, for instance by cutting a 2-bridge knot in the usual way or in a more "silly" way where all the knotting is in one of the two tangles.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Indeed, I forgot to assume that $T_1, T_2$ are prime. Is there a chance that $(B^3,T_2)$ is always unique then? $\endgroup$
    – Adam
    Commented Feb 6, 2022 at 23:07
4
$\begingroup$

Here's another counterexample.

Let $L$ be the unknot, and $T_1$ the 0-tangle (i.e. the tangle with a diagram consisting of two horizontal strands and no crossings). Then there are lots of possible choice for $T_2$.

For example, $T_2$ can be the doubling $D(J)$ of any knot $J$, where by "doubling" I mean: cut $J$ open to obtain 1-tangle, then take the union of that strand with a parallel copy, to obtain the 2-tangle $D(J)$. This 2-tangle consists of two strands, connecting SW to NW, and SE to NE. Each strand is the knot $J$ cut open.

The $D(J)$ are prime, and $(B^3, D(J))$ is not homeomorphic to $(B^3, D(J'))$ for non-isotopic $J$, $J'$.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .