In his YouTube video New rank records for elliptic curves having rational torsion, Noam Elkies uses systems of equations at 6:16 and 8:38 to present $\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}$ curves of rank 14 and rank 15.
I created a similar system of equations for a $\mathbb{Z}/6\mathbb{Z}$ curve of rank 9 (edit: removed original infographic): $$x+y+z=–73826006279$$ $$xyz=–13211438249850179974544071008000$$
I should have negated both equations, but it's too late now, as Andrej Dujella has already provided all the integer solutions.
Now I am trying to create a similar system for a curve without $3$-torsion, specifically for a $\mathbb{Z}/8\mathbb{Z}$ curve of rank 1 mentioned on p. 20 in our recently submitted paper
Halbeisen, Hungerbuehler, Voznyy, and Zargar, A geometric approach to elliptic curves with torsion groups $\mathbb Z/10\mathbb Z$, $\mathbb Z/12\mathbb Z$, $\mathbb Z/14\mathbb Z$, and $\mathbb Z/16\mathbb Z$, arXiv: 2106.06861
$$y^2 = x^3 + 10226878x^2 + 43046721x$$
Question $1$: For the mentioned $\mathbb{Z}/8\mathbb{Z}$ curve, is it possible to keep a format similar to a $\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}$ case (two equations, three variables, +, -, $\times$)? I would really like to avoid squaring/cubing the same variable.
Question $2$: Is it possible to keep a similar format for any other curve having a $2$-torsion, but not $3$-torsion, i.e. for torsion subgroups $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$, $\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}$, $\mathbb{Z}/8\mathbb{Z}$, $\mathbb{Z}/10\mathbb{Z}$, $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$, $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}$, $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}/8\mathbb{Z}$?