The title is meant to be punchy, but also a tongue-in-cheek acknowledgement of the prevalence of ‘reduce’-derived words in this area. (Unfortunately, I overlooked the fact that the question in the title is the opposite of the one in the body. Fortunately, @LaurentMoret-Bailly's answer is quite clear about this: ‘yes’ to the question in the title, ‘no’ to the question below.)
Let $k$ be a separably closed field, let $\overline k/k$ be an algebraic closure, and suppose that $G$ is a connected $k$-group scheme of finite type.
I know that $G_\text{red}$ need not be geometrically reduced, but the standard examples of this have $G_\overline k$ unipotent. Is that for convenience, or is it necessary?
To put it more precisely, suppose that $(G_\overline k)_\text{red}$ is a reductive $\overline k$-group scheme. Does it follow that $G_\text{red}$ is geometrically reduced?