5
$\begingroup$

I have some problem calculating the value of some specific (but quite common) induced maps I stumbled on while reading some papers on group (co)homology and I would like to know if there are general tricks or routines to avoid calculations over the complexes or, if not, which calculations are customary. But let's first fix the notation.

Let $H$ and $H'$ be groups, let $M$ be an $H$-module and $M'$ be an $H'$-module. If $\phi:H\rightarrow H'$ is a homomorphism and $\psi:M\rightarrow M'$ is an $H$-module homomorphism with $M'$ regarded as an $H$-module via $\phi$, then it induces a map $(\phi,\psi)_*:H_i(H,M)\rightarrow H_i(H',M')$ and this is done taking two projective resolutions $\textbf{P}$ and $\textbf{P'}$ of $\mathbb{Z}$ over $\mathbb{Z}H$ and $\mathbb{Z}H'$, respectively, making the latter a resolution over $\mathbb{Z}H'$, noticing that it is still acyclic and using this and the projectivity of $\textbf{P}$ to build the map we are looking for. If $M=M'$ and $\psi=Id_{M'}$, it is customary to write $(\phi,\psi)_*$ as $\phi_*$.

Now for the specific cases.

  1. Let $G=H$, $G'=H\times H$, $M=K=M'$ for a field $K$ on which $G$ acts trivially. Calculate $\phi_*$ where $\phi$ is either $\alpha:g\rightarrow (g,1)$ or $\beta:g\rightarrow (1,g)$ or $\gamma:g\rightarrow (g,g)$. In this case a Künneth formula states that $$H_n(G',M)=\bigoplus_{p=0}^n H_p(G,M)\otimes_M H_{n-p}(G,M).$$ How can one get that the $(H_0(G,M)\otimes_M H_n(G,M)\oplus H_n(G,M)\otimes_M H_0(G,M))$-components of $\alpha_*(h)$, $\beta_*(h)$ and $\gamma_*(h)$ for an $h$ in $H_n(G,M)$ are, resp., $h\otimes 1$, $1\otimes h$ and $h\otimes 1+1\otimes h$?

  2. More generally, let $G$, $G'$, $\alpha$, $\beta$ and $\gamma$ be the same as in point 1., $M$ and $N$ be $G$-modules, $M'=M\otimes_\mathbb{Z} N$ be a $G'$-module by the action $(g,h)\cdot(m\otimes_\mathbb{Z} n)=gm\otimes_\mathbb{Z} hn$ and let $\psi:M\rightarrow M'$ be a suitable $G$-module homomorphism (Doubt: For $\alpha$, $\psi$ could just send $m\in M$ to $m\otimes_\mathbb{Z}\overline{n}$ for a fixed $\overline{n}\in N$ and it seems the same holds for $\gamma$ if $G$ acts trivially on $N$; but for $\beta$?). What is the best way to find the $(H_0(G,M)\otimes_M H_n(G,M)\oplus H_n(G,M)\otimes_M H_0(G,M))$-components of $(\alpha,\psi)_*(h)$, $(\beta,\psi)_*(h)$ and $(\gamma,\psi)_*(h)$ for an $h$ in $H_n(G,M)$, provided that a formula like the following $$H_n(G',M\otimes_\mathbb{Z} N)=\bigoplus_{p=0}^n H_p(G,M)\otimes_\mathbb{Z} H_{n-p}(G,M')$$ still holds? (This should be possible by choosing $M$ and $H_i(G,M')$ to be $\mathbb{Z}$-free)

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In the first paragraph, a map $\phi: H \to H'$ is not enough to give a map $H_\ast(H,M) \to H_\ast(H',M')$; you also need a map $\psi: M \to M'$ which is $H$-equivariant (with respect the $H$-module structure on $M'$ induced by $\phi$. Then you have compositions $H_\ast(H,M) \to H_\ast(H,M') \to H_\ast(H',M')$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 27, 2021 at 17:19
  • $\begingroup$ @JoshuaMundinger, thank you for your comments. I edited the question making it a bit better. Point 2 is still a little messy, but I hope the idea behind is clear $\endgroup$
    – Alex Doe
    Commented Jun 28, 2021 at 21:18

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$
  1. The Kunneth formula is natural for products of homomorphisms. Let $\iota:\{1\}\to H$ be the inclusion of the identity element, and consider $\mathrm{Id}\times \iota:H\times\{1\}\to H\times H$ which can be identified with your map $\alpha$. Applying the Kunneth formula, we see that an element $h\in H_n(H\times\{1\};M)\cong H_n(H;M)\otimes H_0(\{1\};M)$ maps to $h\times 1$ under $\alpha_*$. Similarly for $\beta_*$.

For the diagonal homomorphism $\gamma:H\to H\times H$, we can use functoriality of Kunneth for the projections $p_1:H\times H\to H\times\{1\}$ and $p_2:H\times H\to \{1\}\times H$, and observe that $(p_1)_*$ maps an element in $H_n(H\times H;M)$ to its $H_n(H;M)\otimes H_0(H;M)$ component, and $(p_2)_*$ maps an element in $H_n(H\times H;M)$ to its $H_0(H;M)\otimes H_n(H;M)$ component. Then $p_1\circ \gamma$ and $p_2\circ \gamma$ are both idetified with $\mathrm{Id}_H$.

  1. You might be able to apply a similar reasoning with twisted coefficients. A reference for the Kunneth formula in this case is

Greenblatt, Robert, Homology with local coefficients and characteristic classes, Homology Homotopy Appl. 8, No. 2, 91-103 (2006). ZBL1107.55003.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I guess you mean "h\otimes 1" at r.4, right? $\endgroup$
    – Alex Doe
    Commented Aug 23, 2021 at 14:55
  • $\begingroup$ Do you have a reference for the functoriality of the Künneth formula for the projections or is it very easy to see? $\endgroup$
    – Alex Doe
    Commented Aug 23, 2021 at 14:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AlexDoe: I'm thinking of the projections as being the product of an identity map with a trivial map (to the trivial group). So it's a special case of naturality with respect to products of maps. This is essentially naturality of the homology cross product, which should be discussed in many algebraic topology textbooks (e.g. Dold, Spanier), but doesn't seem to be in Brown's Cohomology of Groups. $\endgroup$
    – Mark Grant
    Commented Aug 23, 2021 at 19:48

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .