0
$\begingroup$

The question asks what is known about integer solutions $(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{y}) = ((x_1, x_2, x_3), (y_1, y_2, y_3))$ to the equation

$$\displaystyle x_1^{r-1} y_1^r + x_2^{r-1} y_2^r = x_3^{r-1} y_3^r$$

where $r \geq 4$ is an integer, $x_1 x_2 x_3 y_1 y_2 y_3 \ne 0$, and $\gcd(x_1 y_1, x_2 y_2, x_3 y_3) = 1$. In particular, does one expect infinitely many solutions, and can one prove an asymptotic lower bound?

When $r = 2,3$ this problem has been studied by Le Boudec and Browning/Valckenborgh respectively, which answers the question in the affirmative in these cases. Le Boudec establishes the exact asymptotic order of magnitude, while Browning-Valckenborgh establishes a lower bound which is expected to be the correct order of magnitude and an upper bound of $O_\epsilon(T^{3/5 + \epsilon})$.

As Henri Cohen remarks below, when $r = 4$ it is possible to choose $y_1 = a, y_2 = b, y_3 = c$ in such a way that the genus one plane cubic curve $a^4 x_1^3 + b^4 x_2^3 = c^4 x_3^3$ has a rational point and has positive rank as an elliptic curve (in particular, $y_1 = y_2 = 1, y_3 = 9$ gives one such choice). This trick will not work when $r$ is sufficiently large.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ There are answers but they depend on the specific height that you are working with. What is the height for you? $\endgroup$
    – Dr. Pi
    Commented Jan 16, 2021 at 19:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Dr.Pi any reasonable height will do for me. In particular I am interested in whether there are infinitely many solutions (so lower bounds are more interesting than upper bounds) $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 16, 2021 at 19:29
  • $\begingroup$ For $r=4$, simply choose $y_1=y_2=1$ and $y_3=9$ (for instance): there are infinitely many integers $x_1$, $x_2$, $x_3$ such that $x_1^3+x_2^3=9^4x_3^3$, even with the coprimeness condition. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 16, 2021 at 19:48
  • $\begingroup$ @HenriCohen ah yes that's a nice trick. I suppose that the question is qualitatively different when $r \geq 5$, in which case any "obvious" specialization will only yield curves of general type, so this type of trick can't work $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 16, 2021 at 19:56

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

Assuming the abc conjecture, there are only finitely many solutions with $r\geq 5$. Indeed, more generally, abc conjecture implies there are only finitely many sums of the form $a+b=c$ in which $a,b,c$ are coprime and all prime exponents in them are at least $4$. Indeed, for any such triple we have $$rad(abc)\leq (abc)^{1/4}\leq c^{3/4}$$ (assuming $a,b,c$ are positive, if not you can switch signs and permute them.) Therefore one definitely shouldn't expect there to be infinitely many solutions for $r\geq 5$. However I doubt an unconditional proof is known, even for a fixed value of $r$.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .