6
$\begingroup$

What was the original reference of Grothendieck's six functor formalism?

I think it was "COHOMOLOGIE A SUPPORTS PROPRES par P. Deligne SGA IV" but maybe there was an earlier paper on the topic.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ Why that Expose XVII in SGA4 (which doesn't seem to mention $f^{!}$ or $\mathbf{R}{\rm{Hom}}$, though discusses the other 4) rather than Expose XVIII (on the topic of global duality, which does mention all 6 functors)? Since SGA4 took place during 1963/4 whereas the seminar on residues and duality by Hartshorne (which discusses 5 of the functors, omitting $f_{!}$, though a primitive form of the latter occurs in Exp. I of SGA2) took place in the summer of 1963 based on notes of Grothendieck written earlier, the 6-functor formalism is found in Grothendieck's duality work before SGA4. $\endgroup$
    – nfdc23
    Commented Sep 27, 2016 at 15:17
  • $\begingroup$ I think both of you are right. The formalism is somewhat implicit in his works on coherent duality, but wasn't explicitly presented until one of the first oral exposés of SGA 5. This exposé, according to Récoltes et Semailles, was split, its contents distributed between those (published) exposés of SGA 4 and the first two (published) exposés of SGA 5, the second one of which was instead put in Deligne's "Cohomologie étale". $\endgroup$
    – Compacto
    Commented Jan 13 at 12:28

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

There doesn't exist a mathematical publication by Grothendieck explicitly presenting that formalism. It was going to be addressed in "Exposé 0" of SGA 5, but the editors excluded it from the final publication*. Of course, it is implicit in each of Grothendieck's duality theories:

  • For coherent sheaves (Serre duality), called "continuous coefficients", the reference at that time was Residues and Duality, which were the notes of a seminar given by Hartshorne, based on Grothendieck's draft. This was the intended subject of what was going to be EGA X.
  • For étale cohomology (Poincaré duality), described as "discrete coefficients", of course, SGA 4 and 5 are the standard source.
  • The formalism is also behind Verdier's treatment of Poincaré duality in locally compact spaces and analytic spaces. These works showed the validity of the formalism outside algebraic geometry.

*Grothendieck talks about it extensively in Récoltes et Semailles (I don't know much about the other side of the story).

EDIT: Gallimard's version of ReS includes additional notes by Grothendieck, written in 1986, and not present in the one I was consulting. In one of these notes, he says that, according to Illusie, this exposé was, in fact, written with the name "Applications de la dualité globale et formules de Künneth", and Grothendieck gave permission to "dismember it" and partition its contents between the following exposés:

  • SGA 4 exposés XVII and XVIII.
  • SGA 5 exposés I and II. Exposé II was, in the end, moved to Deligne's "SGA 4 1/2".

Grothendieck thinks of this decision as a mistake.

About the destiny of that Exposé 0 (and of a previous, introductory Exposé which was also forgotten), he writes (old version of ReS) :

Je viens à l’instant de parcourir mes notes manuscrites pour les premiers trois exposés de SGA 5, notes qu’Illusie a bien voulu me retourner l’an dernier à ma demande. (Il est le seul des ex-rédacteurs qui ait pris la peine de me restituer les notes que je leur avais confiées. . .) Le premier exposé (i.e. the introductory Exposé) consistait en un vaste "tour d’horizon" de ce qui avait été accompli dans le séminaire précédent SGA 4, en ce qui concerne le formalisme cohomologique étale et ses relations à divers autres contextes. Le deuxième exposé (this is the Exposé 0 which I referred to) développe en long et en large le formalisme "abstrait" des six variances. Il y a un formulaire essentiellement complet, mais sans effort encore pour cerner les compatibilités entre isomorphismes canoniques. (C’était là une tâche de nature plus technique, inutile à un moment où je tenais avant tout à "faire passer" ce yoga de dualité, dont je sentais bien tout la force.) Inutile de dire qu’il n’y a trace dans l’édition-Illusie ni de l’un ni de l’autre exposé.

You can also find here a handwritten "cheatsheet" by Grothendieck, summarizing the "formalisme des six opérations".

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .