6
$\begingroup$

In Half of a Coin: Negative Probabilities, author considers pgf of a fair coin represented by random variable, $X = 1_H$:

$$G_X(z) = E[z^X] = \sum_{x=0,1} z^xP(X=x) = (z^0)(1/2) + (z^1)(1/2) = \frac{z+1}{2}$$

Author defines gf of a half-coin (a coin with sides $n=0,1,2,...$ with some sides having negative probability):

$$G_{X_{0.5}}(z) = \sqrt{\frac{z+1}{2}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \binom{1/2}{k} z^k$$

That is, $$P(X = k) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \binom{1/2}{k}$$

If we flip two independent half-coins, their sum is 0 or 1 with probability 1/2. So it's like flipping one fair coin.

This is based on pgf of sums of independent random variables being the products of the pgfs of the random variables.

Later on, there's this fundamental theorem saying that for any gf $f$, there exists two pgfs $g, h$ such that

$$fg = h$$

How is that related to the half-coin?

What are possible $g$ and $h$ that correspond to $$f(z) = \sqrt{\frac{z+1}{2}}$$

?

I was expecting something like two gfs for one pgf as was done with the fair coin and the two half coins (product of two gfs for the half coins is the pgf for the fair coin).

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You mean $fg = h$, not $f=gh$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 1, 2016 at 22:45
  • $\begingroup$ @DouglasZare edited...? $\endgroup$
    – BCLC
    Commented Jul 4, 2016 at 12:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In the paper cited in this question, its author states, specifically for the "half-coin" example, the existence of pgf's $g$ and $h$ such that $fg=h$, with a further reference to another two papers of his, where the "fundamental theorem" is proved, by some rather non-constructive methods. So, the question about an explicit construction (concerning those three publications) seems to make sense. So, I don't understand the close votes. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 5, 2016 at 16:13
  • $\begingroup$ @IosifPinelis What VTCs? I don't see any :( $\endgroup$
    – BCLC
    Commented Jul 5, 2016 at 16:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Re: votes to close, I don't know what privileges the poser of a question has, but in general probably the discrepancy in the visibility of the votes is explained by the fact that @IosifPinelis has over 4000 rep and BCLC has just over 100. $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Jul 5, 2016 at 18:10

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

My previous answer, in much simplified and more explicit form: take $g(z):=\frac{1-\sqrt{1-z}}{z}$ and $$h(z):=f(z)g(z)=\frac{1-\sqrt{1-z}}{z}\,\sqrt{\frac{1+z}{2}} =\frac{\sqrt{1+z}-\sqrt{1-z^2}}{z\sqrt2}.$$ Then $g$ and $h$ are pgf's.

Indeed, as before, let \begin{equation} c_j:=\frac1{j2^{2j-1}} \binom{2 j-2}{j-1}>0. \end{equation} Then \begin{equation} \sqrt{1+z}=1+\sum_{j=1}^\infty(-1)^{j-1}c_j z^j,\quad \sqrt{1-z^2}=1-\sum_{i=1}^\infty c_i z^{2i}, \end{equation} \begin{equation} g(z)=\frac{1-\sqrt{1-z}}{z}=\sum_{j=1}^\infty c_j z^{j-1}, \end{equation} \begin{equation} h(z)\sqrt2=\frac{\sqrt{1+z}-\sqrt{1-z^2}}{z} =\sum_{i=0}^\infty c_{2i+1} z^{2i}+\sum_{i=1}^\infty (c_i-c_{2i}) z^{2i-1}. \end{equation}

It remains to check that $c_i\ge c_{2i}$ for $i\ge1$. Let $r_i:=c_{2i}/c_i$. Then $r_{i+1}/r_i=\frac{16i^2-1}{16i^2-4}>1$ for $i\ge1$, so that $r_i$ is increasing in $i\ge1$ to $\lim_{i\to\infty}r_i=\frac1{2\sqrt2}<1$. So, $r_i<1$ for $i\ge1$, which confirms that $c_i\ge c_{2i}$. This completes the proof.

I am retaining the previous answer, because it shows some of the process by which the second answer was obtained.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Is there supposed to be a sq root there? It's $f=\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}$ $\endgroup$
    – BCLC
    Commented Jul 5, 2016 at 18:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, the $\sqrt{}$ was missing. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 5, 2016 at 18:43
3
$\begingroup$

Let $a_j:=\binom{1/2}j$. Then $a_0=1$ and $a_j=(-1)^{j-1}c_j$ for $j=1,2,\dots$, where \begin{equation} c_j:=\frac1{j2^{2j-1}} \binom{2 j-2}{j-1}>0. \end{equation} Let \begin{equation} g(z):=\sum_{j=0}^\infty b_j z^j,\quad \text{where}\quad b_j:=c_{j+1}>0. \end{equation} One may note that $g(1)=1$. Since $a_0=1>0$ and $b_j>0$ for all $j\ge0$, it is enough to show that for all natural $n$ \begin{equation} s_n:=\sum_{j=1}^n a_j b_{n-j}=\sum_{j=1}^n (-1)^{j-1}p_{n,j}\overset{\text{?}}\ge0, \end{equation} where $p_{n,j}:=c_j c_{n+1-j}$. Indeed, then for $h:=fg$ one has $h(z)=\frac1{\sqrt2}\sum_{n=0}^\infty (b_n+s_n) z^n$, where $s_0:=a_0b_0=1/2>0$.

Obviously, $p_{n,j}=p_{n,n+1-j}$. So, $s_n=0$ if $n$ is even.

Let now $n=2m+1$ be odd, so that $m\in\{0,1,\dots\}$. Then \begin{equation} s_n=s_{2m+1}\ge\sum_{0\le i\le(m-1)/2}(p_{2m+1,2i+1}-p_{2m+1,2i+2}). \end{equation} So, it suffices to show that $p_{2m+1,j}\ge p_{2m+1,j+1}$ for $j=1,\dots,m$. But \begin{equation} \frac{p_{2m+1,j+1}}{p_{2m+1,j}}-1=-\frac{3 + 6 (m - j)}{(1 + j) (4 m + 1 - 2 j)}<0 \end{equation} for $j=1,\dots,m$. This completes the proof.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ What's the $h$ please? $\endgroup$
    – BCLC
    Commented Jul 5, 2016 at 16:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Of course, $h=fg$, as required. I have added details on this. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 5, 2016 at 16:27

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .