12
$\begingroup$

I do functional analysis, and diagrams are popping all over the place. It is about time I learned me some category theory.

Any recommendations?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Is there something in particular that you need to know? In terms of general education, it may help to know just the very basics: definition of category, functor, and natural transformation, examples of limits and colimits in your chosen area, examples of universal properties. Almost any introductory text (e.g., Mac Lane) would give you most of that. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 16, 2015 at 20:19
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Probably something that has examples from analysis would be more motivating. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 16, 2015 at 20:26
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I was thinking that one universal property that ought to be familiar to every analyst is that of completion: the Cauchy completion $\bar{X}$ of a metric space $X$ is characterized by the fact that given any uniformly continuous map $f: X \to Y$ into a complete metric space $Y$, there exists a unique uniformly continuous extension $\bar{X} \to Y$ of $f$, and this characterizes $\bar{X}$ up to isomorphism. Of course this applies more generally in the context of uniform spaces, such as TVS. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 16, 2015 at 20:32
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I think Helemskii's book "Lectures and Exercises on Functional Analysis" contains a very nice intro into category theory. It may be a bit light on the algebraic side, but it certainly does contain a lot of analytic examples and motivations, and once you get the ball rolling and have some favourite examples in mind you can study any classical text on category theory at your leisure. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 16, 2015 at 22:13
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @AntonFetisov Please consider making your comment an answer. To the OP: perhaps you have seen LF-spaces described as colimits of Frechet spaces, and also you may have seen the category of Banach spaces (and weak linear retractions) described as a symmetric monoidal closed category. Also you may be aware that some of the theory of nuclear spaces, developed by Grothendieck, is usefully formulated in the language of category theory. This may provide some additional motivation. You can find some of this described at the nLab. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 16, 2015 at 23:00

2 Answers 2

12
$\begingroup$

As requested, making comment into the answer. I think Helemskii's book "Lectures and Exercises on Functional Analysis" contains a very nice intro into category theory. It may be a bit light on the algebraic side, but it certainly does contain a lot of analytic examples and motivations, and once you get the ball rolling and have some favourite examples in mind you can study any classical text on category theory at your leisure.

You could also enjoy reading his book "Quantum Functional Analysis: Non-Coordinate Approach". It is certainly about analysis rather than category theory, but the guiding principles of CT are always kept in mind and some relevant category-theoretic questions are considered.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Great book! I love the first footnote: "I clearly remember the following curious event: one well-known mathematician was giving a lecture being in low spirit, and for some strange reason he began to vent his anger on the axiom of choice. He splashed it with sarcasm, and after that he continued the lecture with proving a theorem where he used the fact that every ideal of a ring lies in a maximal ideal..." $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 17, 2015 at 8:24
  • $\begingroup$ That makes me remember Exercice 3.3.1 of Tom Leinster's book that I mention in another answer: "Choose a mathematician at random. Ask them whether they can accurately state any axiomatization of sets (without looking it up). If not, ask them what operating principles they actually use when handling sets in their day-to-day work." $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 18, 2015 at 7:42
3
$\begingroup$

I could suggest Tom Leinster's book: "Basic Category Theory", Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics 143. It is a modern introduction to category theory which covers the basic topics of the subject (I had to write an abstract for the Mathematical Reviews so I got it for free). It is not specifically written for people doing functional analysis. It is written for undergraduate students. It contains a lot of examples.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.